Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
CriticalChain · Critical Chain Project Management, Program Management, TOC and Projects
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 2399 - 2428 of 10714   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
2399
I am a newbie to Critical Chain. I have read the book written by Goldratt and by Newbold and Lawrenece P.Leach. Can somebody help me with the avialbale methods...
Neo
neoinus
Offline Send Email
Sep 15, 2005
8:11 pm
2400
Hi, Neo There are many methods. The simplest is one Goldratt proposed initially. It is based on estimating tasks as you would normally do, and reducing the...
Larry
lawrence_leach
Offline Send Email
Sep 16, 2005
9:42 pm
2401
50% of the size of the critical chain as a project buffer. ... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]...
Todd Hartle
thartle
Offline Send Email
Sep 17, 2005
11:48 am
2402
From: "Larry" <lawrence_leach@...> wrote: ... Which you use depends on your purpose and data. Usually, initially anyway, the first method [move the...
Richard
rzultner
Offline Send Email
Sep 18, 2005
1:06 am
2403
I wrote an article for PMI Journal on this because I have a proposal that differs from the Goldratt one: start from the well-known PERT 3-point (pseudo...
Crispin ("Kik") Piney
pineyk
Offline Send Email
Sep 18, 2005
2:48 am
2404
"This is more scientific and verifiable than the original critical chain approach." How so? ... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]...
Todd Hartle
thartle
Offline Send Email
Sep 18, 2005
2:27 pm
2405
Neo: The 50% buffer size is a rule of thumb. Theoretically it is rooted in statistics but the real reason you need a rule of thumb is that an immature...
Douglas and Lynn Brown
dbprofile0410
Offline Send Email
Sep 18, 2005
3:23 pm
2406
Hi, Richard Yes, when they have the real data, and some evidence it is not confounded by multi-tasking (e.g. where they assign full-time project teams). The...
Larry
lawrence_leach
Offline Send Email
Sep 19, 2005
12:29 am
2407
... there are other reasons for not blindly cumulating the "spare time" made up of the offcuts beyond the 50% probability: 1) simple addition of these...
Crispin ("Kik") Piney
pineyk
Offline Send Email
Sep 19, 2005
7:24 am
2408
A few points are not clear to me here: 1) which buffers are you talking about? I may have misunderstood, but it sounds like a contingency buffer, not a...
Crispin (Kik) Piney
pineyk
Offline Send Email
Sep 19, 2005
7:35 am
2409
I stated that the method based on the standard deviation is scientific and verifiable for the following reasons: since the buffer length will be based on a...
Crispin ("Kik") Piney
pineyk
Offline Send Email
Sep 19, 2005
7:58 am
2410
I stated that the method based on the standard deviation is scientific and ... Yes BUT. As discussed many times, In a true project we are not just dealing with...
Jim Bowles
mikeorjim2003
Offline Send Email
Sep 19, 2005
8:12 am
2411
I do not believe that the buffers should be used as a catch-all or an excuse not to carry out effective risk management. As I understand Goldratt's argument,...
Crispin ("Kik") Piney
pineyk
Offline Send Email
Sep 19, 2005
11:33 am
2412
Why do we get three replies from you and not one? Is there an echo? You are entitled to your beliefs about buffer sizing and how these might change over time...
Jim Bowles
mikeorjim2003
Offline Send Email
Sep 19, 2005
11:46 am
2413
Hi, Kik You may enjoy my PM Journal article on buffer sizing. You will find it on my WEB site. Published in 2003, it includes considering PERT, which has...
Larry
lawrence_leach
Offline Send Email
Sep 19, 2005
1:59 pm
2414
Greetings to all! I read a Piney's article (I believe in a PMI journal 1999 or 2000) regarding CC and CPM, where it was clear to me that the author believed...
mbr@...
matiasbirrell
Offline Send Email
Sep 19, 2005
3:42 pm
2415
More discussion on buffer sizing! Again! Douglas and Lynn Brown <padgettbrown@...> wrote: The 50% buffer size is a rule of thumb. Theoretically it is...
Richard
rzultner
Offline Send Email
Sep 19, 2005
11:50 pm
2416
Kik: I agree with your points. Since our new friend is a CCPM newbie, it is more important to be real than to be technically correct. You will probably agree...
Douglas and Lynn Brown
dbprofile0410
Offline Send Email
Sep 20, 2005
2:49 am
2417
On the subject of buy-in, someone sitting near me at last year's TOCICO mentioned that they get better buy-in by advising team members that they are splitting...
Justin Roff-Marsh
justinroffmarsh
Offline Send Email
Sep 20, 2005
8:32 am
2418
Richard said: [REZ] Now, clearly a reasonable rule of thumb can "work". But how is a rule-of-thumb using organization ever going to wean itself off it, and ...
Jim Bowles
mikeorjim2003
Offline Send Email
Sep 20, 2005
10:16 am
2419
Richard, you said: "note that the accuracy of their estimate is NOT critical (a nice side effect of the buffers). But their buy in is." What methodology do you...
Santiago Velásquez...
ifsavel
Offline Send Email
Sep 20, 2005
5:54 pm
2420
1. Sponsorship, led by a well-respected person, who will make clear the problem the company faces if they don’t get better, why the company favors CC, and...
Karlbmiles@...
karlbmiles
Offline Send Email
Sep 20, 2005
6:20 pm
2421
This one's a keeper. Thanks, Karl. Mark mark woeppel President & CEO | Pinnacle Strategies 972-491-1333 | 3600 Lowrey Way . Plano . Texas . 75025 ...
Mark Woeppel
mwoeppel
Offline Send Email
Sep 20, 2005
11:28 pm
2422
Outstanding book that is a great tool for any change effort (and should be appropriate anywhere you need to gain buy-in for a process change effort): "Fearless...
George Schlitz
einschlitz
Offline Send Email
Sep 21, 2005
11:49 am
2423
I agree, it is a keeper. Thanks, Karl. __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com...
Douglas and Lynn Brown
dbprofile0410
Offline Send Email
Sep 22, 2005
3:45 am
2424
Curious as to your thoughts concerning common cause variation and special variation in regards to the cone of uncertainty? ...
Todd Hartle
thartle
Offline Send Email
Sep 22, 2005
7:01 pm
2425
Todd, As I understand it, the "cone of uncertainty" corresponds to the assumption that, as you get nearer to a target, you are much more likely to hit the ...
Crispin ("Kik") Piney
pineyk
Offline Send Email
Sep 23, 2005
6:33 am
2426
Yes you did. I thinking the "cone of uncertainty" only addresses special cause variation and not common cause variation. So as a project progresses then the...
Todd Hartle
thartle
Offline Send Email
Sep 23, 2005
12:41 pm
2427
Frequently there is mention on this list of common and special causes, fundamental concepts of Statistical Process Control, in the context of Critical Chain...
Richard
rzultner
Offline Send Email
Sep 23, 2005
8:49 pm
2428
Richard, I am not sure if Tony is on this list. ... -- __________________________________ Santiago Velásquez Martínez [Non-text portions of this message have...
Santiago Velásquez...
ifsavel
Offline Send Email
Sep 23, 2005
9:07 pm
Messages 2399 - 2428 of 10714   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help