Skip to search.

Breaking News Visit Yahoo! News for the latest.

×Close this window

MyLinkNetwork · MyLinkNetwork Top LinkedIn Networkers

The Yahoo! Groups Product Blog

Check it out!

Group Information

  • Members: 428
  • Category: Other
  • Founded: Nov 24, 2007
  • Language: English
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Messages

Advanced
Messages Help
Messages 762 - 786 of 786   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Show Message Summaries Sort by Date ^  
#762 From: Marc Freedman <marc@...>
Date: Tue Mar 15, 2011 6:34 pm
Subject: Is business networking dead?
fvision
Send Email Send Email
 
You'd think so.  At least that's not where its development is focused. LinkedIn's latest toy is LinkedIn Today with industry news.  What do you think of it?  Do you need it? 

Do you prefer LinkedIn as a Facebook-like platform that can be a portal for all kinds of business activity ... or do you just want more powerful networking like me?

--

Marc

Marc Freedman
Breakthrough Marketing
BR82.com
marc@...
(972) 200-3490


#763 From: Marc Freedman <marc@...>
Date: Wed Mar 16, 2011 5:24 pm
Subject: Plaxo see the light ... finally
marc@...
Send Email Send Email
 
While LinkedIn continues to pursue fluff, Plaxo finally gives up its own silliness and returns, smartly, to its contact management roots.

Plaxo Goes Back To Being A Smart Address Book, Launches Virtual Assistant


--

Marc

Marc Freedman
Breakthrough Marketing
BR82.com
marc@...
(972) 200-3490


#764 From: Marc Freedman <marc@...>
Date: Thu Mar 31, 2011 11:24 pm
Subject: LinkedIn hypocrite - founder says "Good Internet Companies Never Ambush Their Users”
fvision
Send Email Send Email
 
LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman declares "Good Internet Companies Never Ambush Their Users”.  That is very funny, considering the LinkedIn's long history of taking away features and restricting their users without discussion, warning, explanation, notification, relief, or alternative.



#765 From: Marc Freedman <marc@...>
Date: Wed May 4, 2011 11:44 pm
Subject: Social Marketing: It's Relationships, not Numbers
fvision
Send Email Send Email
 
What do you think?  Does 30,000 followers on Twitter have any real value?  Is it equivalent to 30,000 LinkedIn connection?  Marc


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [New post] Social Marketing: It's Relationships, not Numbers
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 22:40:16 +0000
From: My LinkDaddy <no-reply@...>
To: marc@...


WordPress.com

Social Marketing: It's Relationships, not Numbers

Marc Freedman | May 4, 2011 at 4:40 pm | Categories: Marketing, Relationships, Social media | URL: http://wp.me/pAEbu-8y

I'm a numbers man.  Yeah, it's a competitive guy thing.  Today it's marketing metrics.  Seven years ago it was social media.

I saw the top Dallas LinkedIn member had 1,200 connections.  In the words of a A Chorus Line, I said "I can do that".  And I did, and much more.  In three years I was number three in the world.  Objective achieved.

Value modest.  Cost in time great. Return low. Recommended no.

The past two years the game has changed, expanded to Facebook and Twitter.  But there is one difference.  At least with LinkedIn I had access to connection data like location and industry to target contacts.  I had an email address I could mail (for now, until LinkedIn takes that away). It's a real contact.

You don't have that with Facebook and Twitter.   The value of a marginal unengaged contact is nil. And 100,000 times 0 is still 0.  As Paul Gillin writes in Do fans and followers really count?, anyone can buy or acquires tens of thousands of followers.  So you can keep your 45,293 twitheads.  I'm not impressed.

Our updated scorecard for the Twitter numbers studs:

Value negligible.  Cost in time modest. Return negligible. Recommended never.

And it's a good thing.  Because you can focus on the numbers that really count - customers, sales, and engagements.  You can build relationships that have real enduring value ... not big numbers filled with hot air.

Now if you still want to build those LinkedIn connections, have I got a deal for you ...

Add a comment to this post



#766 From: Marc Freedman <marc@...>
Date: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:40 am
Subject: BeKnown be gone?
fvision
Send Email Send Email
 
Do we really need another business social network? What do you think?

I like the trick of Monster beating ... and using ... Facebook to market with the business network.  I'm sure it will find its own niche. 

But when you're that large you ought to be focusing on your core product and entering markets where you can lead ... not get distracted.

Marc

~~~~~~~~~

Monster launches BeKnown professional networking app

Monster Worldwide, the parent company of Monster, launched BeKnown, which appears to compete with LinkedIn. BeKnown is a professional networking app designed to enable Facebook users to establish a professional network and search for jobs.

“BeKnown answers the need and challenge in the marketplace for people to build their professional networks on Facebook while keeping personal and work-related contacts and content completely separate,” said Darko Dejanovic, global CIO and head of product at Monster Worldwide, in a statement.

BeKnown is available in 19 different languages and is available at http://apps.facebook.com/beknown


#767 From: Robert Ross <robross@...>
Date: Tue Jun 28, 2011 3:58 am
Subject: Re: BeKnown be gone?
robross
Send Email Send Email
 
Monster's core product, recruiting services, competes head to head with LinkedIn's primary revenue source, recruiting services. MWW = $1.66B market cap, LNKD = $7.2B market cap.

Monster needs to either grow bigger fast or they run the risk of going further down than they already have - the company has performed very poorly over the past 2-3 years and despite the uptick they got from the BeKnown announcement, they've been one of the most poorly performing stocks in the S&P 500:


So Monster basically *had to* respond to the trend of using social networking for recruiting - frankly with how LinkedIn has been growing over the past few years, especially the past 2, Monster probably took too long to respond & they might have missed the train. While BeKnown might or might not take off, I'd also take a look at BranchOut, which I think has the inside pole position to date for the Facebook LinkedIn competitor:


Re: Monster & LinkedIn, Trefis has done a full analysis of the stock potential for both Monster & LinkedIn {disclaimer, I'm VP BD at Trefis, but not involved in the analysis]:


Rob

Robert Ross | www.linkedin.com/in/robross @robross | 415-290-6433


On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Marc Freedman <marc@...> wrote:
 

Do we really need another business social network? What do you think?

I like the trick of Monster beating ... and using ... Facebook to market with the business network.  I'm sure it will find its own niche. 

But when you're that large you ought to be focusing on your core product and entering markets where you can lead ... not get distracted.

Marc

~~~~~~~~~

Monster launches BeKnown professional networking app

Monster Worldwide, the parent company of Monster, launched BeKnown, which appears to compete with LinkedIn. BeKnown is a professional networking app designed to enable Facebook users to establish a professional network and search for jobs.

“BeKnown answers the need and challenge in the marketplace for people to build their professional networks on Facebook while keeping personal and work-related contacts and content completely separate,” said Darko Dejanovic, global CIO and head of product at Monster Worldwide, in a statement.

BeKnown is available in 19 different languages and is available at http://apps.facebook.com/beknown



#768 From: Marc Freedman <marc@...>
Date: Tue Jun 28, 2011 5:03 am
Subject: Re: BeKnown be gone?
fvision
Send Email Send Email
 
Rob,

Good stuff, thanks.

That makes my point that when you "have to", when it's a me-too move, then it's the beginning of the end.  We saw that happen with Plaxo.  Google and MS can get away with that and shrug off the inevitable failure.  But they're the exception. 

Social networking is a feature, not an app.  The value isn't the networking, it's in the data.  Monster has an incredible data store in their resumes and jobs.  They have failed in innovating to leverage it.

Marc


Robert Ross wrote On 6/27/2011 10:58 PM:
 

Monster's core product, recruiting services, competes head to head with LinkedIn's primary revenue source, recruiting services. MWW = $1.66B market cap, LNKD = $7.2B market cap.


Monster needs to either grow bigger fast or they run the risk of going further down than they already have - the company has performed very poorly over the past 2-3 years and despite the uptick they got from the BeKnown announcement, they've been one of the most poorly performing stocks in the S&P 500:


So Monster basically *had to* respond to the trend of using social networking for recruiting - frankly with how LinkedIn has been growing over the past few years, especially the past 2, Monster probably took too long to respond & they might have missed the train. While BeKnown might or might not take off, I'd also take a look at BranchOut, which I think has the inside pole position to date for the Facebook LinkedIn competitor:


Re: Monster & LinkedIn, Trefis has done a full analysis of the stock potential for both Monster & LinkedIn {disclaimer, I'm VP BD at Trefis, but not involved in the analysis]:


Rob

Robert Ross | www.linkedin.com/in/robross @robross | 415-290-6433


On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Marc Freedman <marc@...> wrote:
 

Do we really need another business social network? What do you think?

I like the trick of Monster beating ... and using ... Facebook to market with the business network.  I'm sure it will find its own niche. 

But when you're that large you ought to be focusing on your core product and entering markets where you can lead ... not get distracted.

Marc

~~~~~~~~~

Monster launches BeKnown professional networking app

Monster Worldwide, the parent company of Monster, launched BeKnown, which appears to compete with LinkedIn. BeKnown is a professional networking app designed to enable Facebook users to establish a professional network and search for jobs.

“BeKnown answers the need and challenge in the marketplace for people to build their professional networks on Facebook while keeping personal and work-related contacts and content completely separate,” said Darko Dejanovic, global CIO and head of product at Monster Worldwide, in a statement.

BeKnown is available in 19 different languages and is available at http://apps.facebook.com/beknown



#769 From: Marc Freedman <marc@...>
Date: Wed Jun 29, 2011 9:11 pm
Subject: LinkedIn market manipulators
fvision
Send Email Send Email
 
Everybody looks out for THEIR best interests, including investment banks.  They certainly don't care about you, the individual investor. When LinkedIn almost doubles its IPO price in one day many cried out about the alleged underpricing.  Even supposedly knowledgeable folks like Henry Blodget (a fellow Yalie) said LinkedIn was getting screwed to the tune of $130 million.

Of course the only ones screwed are those who bought into the hype and bought shares at $100+.  The stock has been trading in the 60s.  As it turns out, i-bank pricing was actually quite good.  It's just that their marketing and sales are even better.

Now the same banks that successfully manufactured first day profits for their investors and corporate customers are up to their old tricks again and insisting it's underpriced.

Once again, buyer beware.  Others are calling this a pump (1, 2).

Marc

Breakthrough Marketing
BAE Workshop & Investments
DallasBlue

#770 From: Marc Freedman <marc@...>
Date: Mon Oct 10, 2011 4:08 pm
Subject: Privacy is for old people says LinkedIn founder
fvision
Send Email Send Email
 
The following from Reid Hoffman is quite interesting, especially since LinkedIn portrays itself as so protective of member privacy and has canceled or frozen the accounts of users (like me) for merely sending emails to connections and contacts.  Marc


Marc's Monday Newsletter

 
Marc's Monday Newsletter
Good Monday morning, Marc,

Meet Reid Hoffman, the billionaire founder of LinkedIn. In this video, he shares with an audience at Davos his opinion about your privacy concerns:




Yep, I think it's just as unbelievable as you do — the founder of LinkedIn, the largest social network for professional people in the world says "all these concerns about privacy tend to be old people issues."

"Old people" issues? Are you even allowed to say something like that these days? And that's how the founder of LinkedIn feels about your privacy?

Well, I can't speak for every internet company founder, but I can tell you that most of us think privacy issues are very, very important, and that Reid's viewpoint does not represent internet executives as a whole.

Those of us in the job industry have a special duty and responsibility to treat your privacy with care, because privacy issues are especially important in the job search. When the economy is bad, and your company might be looking to cut employees, and you're trying to make your mortgage… privacy issues aren't old people issues, they're normal people issues.

So I suppose I find it offensive that a billionaire founder, speaking at Davos — the world's most discriminative "old boys' network" event, held each year in the Swiss Alps — ridicules your concerns in such a condescending way.

It's probably the most arrogant comment I've heard from a business executive since Leona Helmsley said "Only the little people pay taxes." It's sad, disappointing, and yet, characteristic.

Barack Obama LinkedIn Town hall

Reid Hoffman listens to President Obama speak at his LinkedIn Town Hall.

When you signed up for LinkedIn, they never asked for your permission to sell your information to recruiters and HR departments, did they? They never told you that your actions, and your behaviors, and your privacy were going to be sold off to recruitment firms and HR departments. Even today, their User Agreement makes no mention of executive recruiters or human resources. (I mean, c'mon, if it was all on the up-and-up, they'd mention it to you when you sign up, or at least in the User Agreement or Privacy Policy, wouldn't they?)

Layoffs have increased 212% this year compared to last year because of the lousy economy, but you shouldn't be concerned about the fact that LinkedIn has the legal right to sell your job-hunting information to advertisers, show it in their advertisements, and leak it to your current colleagues or boss, if they want to.

No, you shouldn't worry about that, at all, says Reid Hoffman, billionaire founder of LinkedIn, because "all these concerns about privacy tend to be old people issues."

At TheLadders, we don't agree.

We don't agree that you're just inventory to be pushed off to the highest bidder.

We don't believe that in this economy, companies should be so cavalier about your privacy.

We don't agree that "all these concerns about privacy tend to be old people issues."

We don't agree and that's why we've always been different.

It's why we screen every recruiter and job listing before it's allowed onto our site. That's why your co-workers, your colleagues or your boss can't see your profile on TheLadders. That's why we don't sell your private information to advertisers — because we've never accepted display advertising on our site.

It's also why we launched a survey on privacy issues last week to thousands of Americans like you, and I'll be reporting back to you on the results in the weeks ahead.

So, if you agree that all privacy issues are just "old people's issues", well, godspeed to you.

But if you'd prefer to work with a company that cares about you, your privacy, and making you successful in your job search, then we're honored by your patronage, and we thank you for it.

Have a great, safe, private week in your job search!

I'll be rooting for you,

Marc Cenedella

Marc Cenedella, CEO & Founder

P.S. Join the conversation on my blog » "Privacy is for old people says LinkedIn founder"
 

#771 From: Marc Freedman <marc@...>
Date: Tue Jul 17, 2012 6:46 pm
Subject: Troubled by a Weak Connection
fvision
Send Email Send Email
 
Writer Lee Siegel is horrified, and amused, to send a LinkedIn invitation to her dead mother .... Marc

Troubled by a Weak Connection

A LINKEDIN invitation was recently sent out from me to my mother. This disturbed me for two reasons. First, I hadn’t meant to send it to her at all. How superficial can you be, sending a social networking invitation via e-mail to your very own mother that coldly notes, “Building these connections can create opportunities in the future.” Besides, far from having opportunities, or a knowable future, my mother died more than three years ago.

Sending out the invitation was an accident, you see, a great big techno-blunder, the result of mental diffusion and attrition. For months, I had been worn down by one LinkedIn pitch after another. Trying to be polite to whoever was doing the inviting, I at first attempted to accept, but accepting entailed joining LinkedIn, so I ended up deleting, somewhat guiltily, the solicitations as they arrived.

Then came that special day. In a haze of absent-mindedness, I received an invitation from someone with whom I had been wanting to renew an acquaintance. I clicked on accept. I was redirected to a registration page. After filling in the fields marked as required for instant human linkage, I found myself staring at photographs of four people, all known to me, and being asked to attempt to connect with one or more of them. I was also offered — this should have been accompanied by the soundtrack to the shower scene in “Psycho” — the opportunity to click on a tab innocently designated as “select all.”

Now, like a child absorbing the warning never to talk to strangers, I had assimilated the familiar admonition never to click on the “reply all” tab on my e-mail screen before undergoing days of reflection, introspection and legal consultation. However, although my information-laden cerebellum had at last registered “reply all” in its avoidance file, the antediluvian underside of my brain apparently saw no point in cross-referencing “reply all” with “select all.” Entering the functional sleepwalking segment of my afternoon, relieved on some level to be surrendering to the status quo, happy finally to oblige, I steered my cursor into the heart of the new tab in my life and wearily clicked.

I got a handful of acceptances. Then I got some more. After a while, I started receiving a few e-mail messages from friends and concerned acquaintances explaining, with a dash of defiance and a hint of disapproval, why they didn’t “do that sort of thing.” I was mortified. As the author of a book exposing the Internet’s dehumanizing qualities (“Against the Machine”: like it, share it, recommend it, tag it, Digg it, e-mail it, hug it, take it out to dinner, add to your shopping cart now), I should have been the last one to be suckered by a social networking gambit.

But the mortification was nothing compared with my horror when I realized that none of the people responding to my invitation were the people to whom I had intended to send it.

A frenzied investigation and a few maddeningly pert screens later, LinkedIn proudly informed me that it had sent out the invitation to 974 potential connections. Somehow, beneath the site’s aggressively agreeable aspect, there lurked an alien life form that possessed the capacity to use e-mail address books to lure earthlings back to its own world (Planet Distractoid) by masquerading as a suspiciously formal small-town Rotarian: “Zitlon XYZ has indicated you are a friend.” Because I had had the same AOL account from the dawn of my e-mail existence, LinkedIn was able to make its digital overtures to every person or entity I had ever contacted in that medium. All 974 of them.

Lawyers, landscapers, accountants, literary agents, baby sitters, window-installers, art dealers, ex-girlfriends; the ex-boyfriend of an ex-girlfriend (don’t ask), obstetricians, dentists, ophthalmologists, gastroenterologists, urologists, psychologists, pediatricians, billing offices for all of the preceding, the design director of Victoria’s Secret (what?), editors who were no longer editors, bosses who were no longer bosses, enemies, rivals, my estranged brother (it’s complicated), my ex-wife, two litigious former landlords, Marisa Tomei (long story), the International Red Cross, people still around somewhere and those who, like my mother, had made the journey to the other side (password accepted!) from our signed-on, linked-to, downloading-now, uploading-complete earth — they all received an invitation to be “professionally connected” to their old pal, Lee Siegel.

I tried desperately to interrupt the e-mailing process but succeeded only in deleting the endless lists of invitees, not the invitations themselves. Like the fugitive past, the LinkedIn process was inexorable (and perhaps unethical, I learned later, thanks to a security breach caused in part by the blandly affable company’s failure to “hash” and “salt” subscribers’ passwords like so many boiled potatoes). Yet thanks to the debacle, my past was no longer so fugitive. It was all around me. Here, in a network with 974 nodes, spread out like some existential atlas, seemed to be every interpersonal action that had shaped my destiny.

It grew worse. A few nights later, I found myself at a literary banquet, amid a swarm of people, at least a third of whom had received an invitation to be professionally connected to yours truly. Two subjects of Olympic-league grudges looked at me from across the glittering room with an indecipherable expression. Did my invitation out of the blue provoke in them feelings of vindication, scorn or conciliation?

The truth was that I could barely remember the cause of the friction between us. The Internet nightmare was becoming something like a dark fairy tale. I was struck by the moral: Virtual space cannot reconcile what real time has lost. In social networking’s death-defying universe, your remotest past is but a click away. But it isn’t. That evening at the fancy dinner, I was standing indifferently beside people with whom I had once, professionally and personally, been passionately involved.

The same applied to the other invitees. It went without saying that the friends among them regarded the invitations with, at the very least, perplexity. As for the others, what was once a lively bond between us had given way to fading affinities for one reason or another, not to mention the fact that some of the invitees had died. The bewildered, broken or, should I say, evolved links might have been an abomination in the robotically social perspective of LinkedIn, but such change is the most natural thing in the world. Social networking, I realized, is a type of asocial engineering. It tries to disguise the finality of time — the most consequential dimension of relationships — with the cozy convenience of spatial proximity. It is an attempt to place a smooth screen over the time’s wrinkle, to put Botox on the face of mortality itself

So Mom, if by some numinous chance, you received my invitation, excuse the impertinence. (But if you happen to run into Bellow, Mailer or Updike, would you mind asking them to add me to their professional networks?) Everyone else, kindly click on the following message from me that is most applicable:

Forgive me.

E-mail me.

Please go away.

Let’s have lunch.

Why did you do that?

Whatever.

You have no idea how much I miss you.

Lee Siegel is the author, most recently, of “Harvard Is Burning.”



#772 From: Marc Freedman <marc@...>
Date: Mon Sep 17, 2012 7:08 am
Subject: LinkedIn extortion
marc@...
Send Email Send Email
 
In LinkedIn SNAFU, popular tech writer Bob Cringely says LinkedIn has twice sent out blank link requests to contacts against his wishes.  He writes "Of course LinkedIn support is useless and I can’t send messages to anyone in the organization without first upgrading my account, which costs money. So this LinkedIn fiasco is also a form of extortion."

One of his commenters had the same problem.   Another wrote Why I deleted my LinkedIn profile.  Several wrote that they never had or have deleted their accounts.

What do you think?

Marc

--


Marc Freedman
Breakthrough Marketing
BR82.com
marc@...
Skype Razorpop
972-200-3490
Schedule a meeting



#773 From: Marc Freedman <marc@...>
Date: Mon Oct 22, 2012 5:12 am
Subject: LinkedIn contact peekaboo
fvision
Send Email Send Email
 
Friends,

Vladimir Mihai Pacuraru reminded me that if you're a basic (free) subscriber LinkedIn now hides the full names of people three degrees away.

Of course you can find or join such connections in a joint LinkedIn group to get the full name AND make direct contact.  So it's just a minor irritation.

Core networking and subscriptions have changed little over the years. It's sad that they remove tiny functions like this when they could be adding new and real features!

Do you agree?  What other tips or changes can you share?

Best Regards,
Marc


#774 From: Marc Freedman <marc@...>
Date: Fri Nov 2, 2012 5:00 pm
Subject: LinkedIn makes more cuts
fvision
Send Email Send Email
 
Friends,

Vlad write about more cuts:

Actually, I've just discovered that the limitation is far worse:
"Full profiles for 3rd-degree connections are available only to premium account holders. Upgrade your account"


Indeed I've found that I have to play games just to see many 2nd levels.  Often LinkedIn will say the contact is out my network ... and at the same time display that we're 2nd level connections!  The only sure way to get past that is to look the person up on a mutual group.

LinkedIn is back to its old tricks in reducing functionality.  Do you see other signs that it's getting worse ... or better for networkers.

Marc


Marc Freedman wrote On 10/22/2012 12:12 AM:
Friends,

Vladimir Mihai Pacuraru reminded me that if you're a basic (free) subscriber LinkedIn now hides the full names of people three degrees away.

Of course you can find or join such connections in a joint LinkedIn group to get the full name AND make direct contact.  So it's just a minor irritation.

Core networking and subscriptions have changed little over the years. It's sad that they remove tiny functions like this when they could be adding new and real features!

Do you agree?  What other tips or changes can you share?

Best Regards,
Marc



#775 From: "Lonny Gulden" <lonny@...>
Date: Fri Nov 2, 2012 5:13 pm
Subject: RE: LinkedIn makes more cuts
lgulden55347
Send Email Send Email
 

Marc,

 

One of the features recently removed which I miss is the ability to download a connections vCard to Outlook. You can find it in a status update a connection may make, but it’s no longer available from the profile page.

 

Lonny

 

Description: logo signature

Lonny J. Gulden                                                                      Twitter: @linkedinguru

ChiefConnectionsOfficer.com                         Web: www.chiefconnectionsofficer.com

O: 952.829.7828                                         Email: lonny@...

M: 612.867.3560                             LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/linkedinguru

F: 708.402.7452                                                   Google+ http://gplus.to/linkedinguru

 

From: MyLinkNetwork@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MyLinkNetwork@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Marc Freedman
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 12:00 PM
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Subject: [MyLinkNetwork] LinkedIn makes more cuts

 

 

Friends,

Vlad write about more cuts:

Actually, I've just discovered that the limitation is far worse:
"Full profiles for 3rd-degree connections are available only to premium account holders. Upgrade your account"


Indeed I've found that I have to play games just to see many 2nd levels.  Often LinkedIn will say the contact is out my network ... and at the same time display that we're 2nd level connections!  The only sure way to get past that is to look the person up on a mutual group.

LinkedIn is back to its old tricks in reducing functionality.  Do you see other signs that it's getting worse ... or better for networkers.

Marc

Marc Freedman wrote On 10/22/2012 12:12 AM:

Friends,

Vladimir Mihai Pacuraru reminded me that if you're a basic (free) subscriber LinkedIn now hides the full names of people three degrees away.

Of course you can find or join such connections in a joint LinkedIn group to get the full name AND make direct contact.  So it's just a minor irritation.

Core networking and subscriptions have changed little over the years. It's sad that they remove tiny functions like this when they could be adding new and real features!

Do you agree?  What other tips or changes can you share?

Best Regards,
Marc

 


#776 From: MyLinkNetwork@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sun Dec 2, 2012 1:52 am
Subject: File - Welcome to MyLink Network!
MyLinkNetwork@yahoogroups.com
Send Email Send Email
 
The following is a reminder about the  MyLink Network Yahoo group mission,
policies, and resources.

MyLink Network is a discussion and support group for top users of the LinkedIn
business social network.  Discuss LinkedIn news, issues, use, suggestions, and
criticism in an open and friendly setting.  We accept all LinkedIn
denominations, including the libertines, the open networkers, the strong
networkers, and new and learning users.

The Group is intended for a professional discussion about LinkedIn and online
networking. It is not to be used for networking itself. Use LinkedIn and sites
like http://MyLinkNetwork.com and http://MyLinkGroups.com for that.

We recommend that all users register themselves at http://MyLinkNetwork.com .


GUIDELINES

We strive to make the group a positive, effective, and efficient experience for
all our members. Therefore messages from new members will be moderated. After
one or more acceptable posts we will change your status to unmoderated so your
posts will immediately show up.

Check current group policies at:
http://toplinkedin.pbwiki.com/YahooGroupGuidelines


http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyLinkNetwork/sfupld?path=/&create=1


OTHER HELP

HAVE QUESTIONS? We’ve got answers, boobie.
1. WRITE. That's this group!
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/MLINKNETWORK

2. READ. 100s of pages with articles, tips, and links.
http://MYLINKWIKI.com

3. LEARN. Teleseminars, webinars, & consulting.
http://MYLINKCLASS.com


GROUP DETAILS

Access/archives: http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyLinkNetwork/
Post message: MyLinkNetwork@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: MyLinkNetwork-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: MyLinkNetwork-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: MyLinkNetwork-owner@yahoogroups.com

#777 From: MyLinkNetwork@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wed Jan 2, 2013 2:28 am
Subject: File - Welcome to MyLink Network!
MyLinkNetwork@yahoogroups.com
Send Email Send Email
 
The following is a reminder about the  MyLink Network Yahoo group mission,
policies, and resources.

MyLink Network is a discussion and support group for top users of the LinkedIn
business social network.  Discuss LinkedIn news, issues, use, suggestions, and
criticism in an open and friendly setting.  We accept all LinkedIn
denominations, including the libertines, the open networkers, the strong
networkers, and new and learning users.

The Group is intended for a professional discussion about LinkedIn and online
networking. It is not to be used for networking itself. Use LinkedIn and sites
like http://MyLinkNetwork.com and http://MyLinkGroups.com for that.

We recommend that all users register themselves at http://MyLinkNetwork.com .


GUIDELINES

We strive to make the group a positive, effective, and efficient experience for
all our members. Therefore messages from new members will be moderated. After
one or more acceptable posts we will change your status to unmoderated so your
posts will immediately show up.

Check current group policies at:
http://toplinkedin.pbwiki.com/YahooGroupGuidelines


http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyLinkNetwork/sfupld?path=/&create=1


OTHER HELP

HAVE QUESTIONS? We’ve got answers, boobie.
1. WRITE. That's this group!
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/MLINKNETWORK

2. READ. 100s of pages with articles, tips, and links.
http://MYLINKWIKI.com

3. LEARN. Teleseminars, webinars, & consulting.
http://MYLINKCLASS.com


GROUP DETAILS

Access/archives: http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyLinkNetwork/
Post message: MyLinkNetwork@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: MyLinkNetwork-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: MyLinkNetwork-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: MyLinkNetwork-owner@yahoogroups.com

#778 From: Marc Freedman <marc@...>
Date: Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:01 pm
Subject: LinkedIn kills more babies
fvision
Send Email Send Email
 
What do you think of the latest casualty, LinkedIn Answers?  Marc


WordPress.com
Marc Freedman posted: "First they kill LinkedIn Events.  Now LinkedIn Answers faces the axe in a few weeks. And of course they do so with no community discussion. Members should just be happy they were given some notice, which often is not the case with LinkedIn changes. For"



#779 From: MyLinkNetwork@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sun Feb 3, 2013 12:25 am
Subject: File - Welcome to MyLink Network!
MyLinkNetwork@yahoogroups.com
Send Email Send Email
 
The following is a reminder about the  MyLink Network Yahoo group mission,
policies, and resources.

MyLink Network is a discussion and support group for top users of the LinkedIn
business social network.  Discuss LinkedIn news, issues, use, suggestions, and
criticism in an open and friendly setting.  We accept all LinkedIn
denominations, including the libertines, the open networkers, the strong
networkers, and new and learning users.

The Group is intended for a professional discussion about LinkedIn and online
networking. It is not to be used for networking itself. Use LinkedIn and sites
like http://MyLinkNetwork.com and http://MyLinkGroups.com for that.

We recommend that all users register themselves at http://MyLinkNetwork.com .


GUIDELINES

We strive to make the group a positive, effective, and efficient experience for
all our members. Therefore messages from new members will be moderated. After
one or more acceptable posts we will change your status to unmoderated so your
posts will immediately show up.

Check current group policies at:
http://toplinkedin.pbwiki.com/YahooGroupGuidelines


http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyLinkNetwork/sfupld?path=/&create=1


OTHER HELP

HAVE QUESTIONS? We’ve got answers, boobie.
1. WRITE. That's this group!
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/MLINKNETWORK

2. READ. 100s of pages with articles, tips, and links.
http://MYLINKWIKI.com

3. LEARN. Teleseminars, webinars, & consulting.
http://MYLINKCLASS.com


GROUP DETAILS

Access/archives: http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyLinkNetwork/
Post message: MyLinkNetwork@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: MyLinkNetwork-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: MyLinkNetwork-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: MyLinkNetwork-owner@yahoogroups.com

#780 From: Marc Freedman <marc@...>
Date: Wed Feb 6, 2013 7:59 am
Subject: LinkedIn is stupid, part 265
marc@...
Send Email Send Email
 


WordPress.com
Marc Freedman posted: "In our last chapter our hero discovered the unknown country of tags wherein he thought "Aha!  I don't need to click every single freaking connection to send a message to the same group.  I can just create a tag and use that in the future." In today's e"



#781 From: Marc Freedman <marc@...>
Date: Fri Mar 1, 2013 9:03 am
Subject: LinkedIn, you make me laugh
fvision
Send Email Send Email
 
I was testing a Custom Quicklink order where a LinkedIn member can provide a branded link to his contacts for one click invitations.  On the LinkedIn invitation page I was greeted by a new message that I was now required to enter the email address of all invitees because several past recipients said they didn't know me.  But if I clicked a special link I'd see a new page (below) where I could agree to be a good boy in the future and the restriction would be lifted.

The funny part:
  • This restriction isn't new.  It's been a manual process and been on and off over the years.  It took them 5 YEARS to formalize and code it.
  • After making me jump through this hoop LinkedIn still wouldn't let me invite him because I was over the connection limit.

Marc

Invitation Restriction

Your account has been restricted because a significant number of LinkedIn users whom you have invited to your network have indicated that they don’t know you. Use of LinkedIn is subject to the terms of our User Agreement, which you have violated. An example of the violation includes breach of Section 11, LinkedIn User DOs & DON’Ts.

    “As a condition to access LinkedIn, you agree to this User Agreement and to strictly observe the following DOs and DON’Ts:

    Don’t – Invite people with whom you have no prior relationship to join your network.”

By selecting the checkbox and clicking “OK” you Agree you will comply with all the terms of the User Agreement. If you violate the agreement, you acknowledge that your account may remain permanently restricted or be closed by LinkedIn.

I have read and agree to the above statement.

#784 From: Marc Freedman <marc@...>
Date: Wed May 8, 2013 1:56 am
Subject: LI Connections Export fix? - LI Contact Manager
marc@...
Send Email Send Email
 
Friends,

Is anyone familiar with Terri Armstrong's Export Contacts Fix for Linked In (attached)?  The trick apparently is to just delete all tags from your connections page.  The display automatically reverts to the old connections address book style and they can then be downloaded without problem. 

Can a few people with over 10K connections test this and report here whether this works???

I've spent days creating tags, such as for all connections in Dallas.  I'm not about to blow that all away until I have strong confirmation that this works. 

Also, the limitation of the export data file remains.  It doesn't show location or industry.  The LinkedIn Contact Manager (LICM) software may help here.  It integrates the emails of the LI export with the additional data obtained via API.  But it's not  perfect.  Over 30% of connections in my test didn't have emails after final merging.

LICM is now a two step process.

1. Use API to import current connections. Import took just over one hour to process 31K connections, net 29.5K. 1500 connections or 5% didn't import.

2. Merge LI export file.  I tested an export file that was 3 years old.   Over 5.4K or 28% of the connections were not mapped to an email.  I estimate that 30% of the contacts had email addresses that were no longer accurate due to the age of the file.  So that leaves only 9.9K or the 31K current members or 32% randomly with accurate emails for me.

--

Marc

Marc Freedman
Breakthrough Marketing
marc@...
Skype Razorpop
972-200-3490
Schedule a meeting

PowerCMO Marketing Innovation
Revenue Typhoon Marketing System
Network2Me Business and Personal Networking


1 of 1 File(s)


#785 From: Marc Freedman <marc@...>
Date: Thu May 9, 2013 2:37 am
Subject: LinkedIn Contacts - are they serious?
marc@...
Send Email Send Email
 
I'd love to be a fan but ...  LinkedIn can't manage more than 10,000 connections.  Why would anyone give them all their contacts?!?!

Has anyone tried this yet?   If so, your thoughts?  Are you able to filter and sort your contacts by multiple criteria like location,  industry, and tag?  Are users still unable to download their contacts if they have more than 10K?  It's now available to me but I'd like more info first, which of course LinkedIn doesn't provide.

Note: The download fix I sent before didn't work for a few folks with over 10K connections.  So it's another failed hack for top networkers.

Marc



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Marc, stay in touch with Michael using the new LinkedIn Contacts
Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 13:10:42 -0700
From: LinkedIn <linkedin@...>
Reply-To: LinkedIn <donotreply@...>
To: marc@...


LinkedIn
Be one of the first to see the new LinkedIn Contacts
Linkedin


 

Marc, you're invited to a smarter way to stay in touch!

 




Gmail Yahoo! Linkedin
All your contacts
in one place




Congrats on
the new job!
Never miss an
opportunity to
say hello




Take it on your mobile device

 
Learn more




This is an occasional email to help you get the most of LinkedIn. Unsubscribe.
This email was intended for Marc Freedman (Entrepreneur/CEO/CMO � Web 2.0/Social Media/Tech Visionary � BR82 Marketing �Your LinkDaddy @ marc@m). Learn why we include this.
If you need assistance or have questions, please contact LinkedIn Customer Service.
© 2013, LinkedIn Corporation. 2029 Stierlin Ct, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA.





#786 From: Marc Freedman <marc@...>
Date: Thu May 9, 2013 6:24 pm
Subject: LinkedIn Channels
marc@...
Send Email Send Email
 
Linkedin continues their push to be major publisher.  Do you regularly read LinkedIn Today and their top "Influencers"?  Will you get deeper with the new LinkedIn Channels?

I don't and won't.  Once again they move away from their core value of networking.  At least LinkedIn Events and Answers, now killed, directly added value to networking.

A publishing push like this is typical of market leaders who want to "own" your time. But it almost always backfires and leaves them vulnerable.  Just look at how Yahoo was crushed by Google.

What do you think?

Marc


On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Official LinkedIn Blog <linkedincorpblog@...> wrote:

The LinkedIn Blog



Refreshed LinkedIn Today Offers a New Way to Discover Content with Channels [SLIDESHOW]

Posted: 08 May 2013 07:58 AM PDT

We want to make it easier for you to stay on top of the news and insights you need to be great at what you do. Millions of professionals are coming to LinkedIn to glean these daily insights to help inform their business conversations and decisions everyday.

You will start to see a refreshed look on LinkedIn Today and the introduction of channels to make it easier for you to Discover and Share professional news and insights. Through channels you can follow broader topic areas that cross multiple industries and professional sectors. By following channels you will have access to timely and relevant professional news and insights that can help you stay one step ahead and be in the know on what’s trending in your professional network. Channels represent a more comprehensive way to discover, share, and engage with high-quality Influencer posts, top news sources, and SlideShare content — all in one place.

New features include:

  • New, simpler and modern design – We’ve streamlined the look and feel of LinkedIn Today to make it easier for you to discover and share the news and information that matters most to you.
  • Follow a Channel – You can follow more than 20 different channels ranging from topics such as Your Career, Economy, Social Impact, Big Ideas and Innovation, and Higher Education, with more channels to be added over time. Once you follow a channel, you will automatically see updates from that channel directly in your Homepage stream.
  • New ways to sort content – You can easily navigate to exactly what you’re looking for with new sorting options, including:
    • Your News – Offers a customized LinkedIn Today page, which features the latest news from the channels and Influencers you follow.
    • Influencer Posts – Provides a quick overview of the top Influencer posts of the day.
    • All Influencers – Shows you our more than 250 Influencers in one place, sorted alphabetically and by number of followers, so you can easily follow someone.
    • All Channels – Displays our new channels so you can easily follow the professional topics that interest you.
  • More relevant email digests – Your email digests will now offer a comprehensive overview of top Influencer posts, trending professional news, and Slideshare content all in one place.

The newly refreshed LinkedIn Today experience with channels is rolling out to all english-speaking members this week. Start following a channel today to see what is trending in your professional universe by going here: http://www.linkedin.com/today.






Messages 762 - 786 of 786   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help