|
Aug 28, 2007 |
|
|
Revised en bloc law fixes imbalances in
mixed estates |
|
|
By Fiona Chan |
|
|
HOME owners who live in mixed
developments - which have both apartments and shops or offices - will now get
a bigger say if their estates go en bloc. This is thanks to a proposed law change which will require
another layer of consent from an estate's owners for a collective sale. Consent is granted now if owners who hold at least 80 per
cent of a development's share values vote in favour
of a sale. If a development is less than 10 years old, the requirement is 90
per cent. But the upcoming change will add another condition to en
bloc sales regardless of whether the estate is mixed or not: The owners who
want to sell must also have units that make up at least 80 per cent of the development's
total area. Again, this is upped to 90 per cent if the estate is less than 10
years old. This change was made to address the imbalance in share
values in a mixed development. Share values are assigned when a unit is first
sold, and help determine what each owner pays in maintenance fees and how
many voting rights he has in an estate's management. Although share values are partly determined by unit size,
owners of commercial units generally get more share values than home owners.
For every one share value given to a home owner, an office owner in the same
estate gets four and a shop owner, five. This has led to complaints from residents in mixed
developments who are reluctant to sell their estate en bloc but who may not
have a choice. The proposed change has itself been tweaked since March,
when the Ministry of Law first considered a second layer of consent. Its initial proposal was based on the total number of an
estate's units, rather than its total area. But after feedback from the
public and experts, the ministry changed its mind. Property consultants yesterday said the new rule will make
things more equitable for home owners. 'The original plan to go by number of units would have been
unfair to owners of large units, because they would have paid more for their
units but would have only one say,' said Mr Karamjit Singh, executive director of property firm Credo
Real Estate. Mr Lui Seng Fatt, head of
investments at Jones Lang LaSalle, warned that this new rule may make it
harder for mixed developments to go en bloc. 'Also, owners with a larger
floor area may now have a bigger say, not only in voting but also in how to
split the sale proceeds,' he added. But the change may not have much impact on the en bloc
market - 90 per cent of deals done since last year were in purely residential
estates, said Mr Nicholas Mak,
director of research and consultancy at Knight Frank. |
|