Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
Silent-PC · Group for exchanging experiences related to silent personal computers
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 13240 - 13240 of 13240   Newest  |  < Newer  |  Older >  |  Oldest
Messages: Show Message Summaries   (Group by Topic) Sort by Date v  
#13240 From: "David Neeley" <dbneeley@...>
Date: Tue Jul 1, 2008 1:04 am
Subject: Re: Re: Undervolting Intel Core2 Duo?
dbneeley
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
What about the 45 nm processors ("Wolfdale") now appearing? IIRC, one
example is the E8300...has anyone any experience with undervolting
these puppies? Since they are already very power-efficient for their
performance, I'm wondering what could really be done by serious
quiet-PC folks. However, just now I lack the funds to experiment....

TIA for any info!

David

On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 11:45 PM, John Paterson <duroby@...> wrote:
> There is another reason for reducing the voltage; but it is not usually a user
determined function.
>
> If you are trying to switch a transistor from "on" to "off" or vice versa, the
time taken is finite.  But the rate of change of voltage is constant across most
chips.  In other words they are using the same substance for the substrate, give
or take.  So the lower the voltage change, the faster the switch.  This is why
we have seen a steady reduction in the operating voltage of processors since the
8088.

Messages 13240 - 13240 of 13240   Newest  |  < Newer  |  Older >  |  Oldest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help