The ERA clearly says "non-binding until the equipments is installed in your
phone closet"

Delivery in itself should not be equivalent to those terms.

>From: "dynam1cjourneys" <dynam1cjourneys@...>
>Reply-To: TheAberdeenKid@yahoogroups.com
>To: TheAberdeenKid@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [TheAberdeenKid] IFC
>Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 19:42:13 -0000
>
>I think I was sued that way in NJ. But, if the leases are VOID in
>Illinois, then what is their basis for suit since they are in
>Illinois? That you unwittingly induced them to pay Norvergence big
>bucks for for a $1000 matrix and prepaid services? And why weren't
>they paying one year at a time? They were not even allowed to phone
>you to see if the equipment was working and installed (according to
>their master agreement with Norvergence). They paid on the D& A, but
>as all of us know, that was presented as proof that the matrix was
>dropped off, much like a UPS signature. This just keeps getting deeper
>and deeper. And 11,000 small businesses all tell the same story.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>