Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
WREGIS-ORC
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Fw: WREGIS Cost & Revenue Analysis - Comments are due by COB Thursd   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #114 of 121 |

Dear WREGIS stakeholders,

 

Due to the size of the attachments, the 2 sets of comments have been attached to this e-mail.  Thank you for your patience.

 

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Jan Hamrin

Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 4:31 PM

Subject: WREGIS Cost & Revenue Analysis

 

Attached is the WREGIS Cost & Revenue Analysis paper.  It incorporates some suggestions from the Institutional Committee call on this topic.  For more background, the notes from the 9.17.04 IC call are on the WREGIS/Yahoo website.  In addition, I have attached comments on the original paper from PG&E and the CEC Legal Office.

 

Comments are due by COB Thursday, September 30th.

 

Your task is to provide guidance to the WREGIS Sponsors who will set the initial WREGIS Fee structure once WREGIS actual costs are known.   The areas where we are seeking guidance are:

  1. Types of fees -- Do you agree with the set of fees described in the paper?  If not, why not and what would you recommend?
  2. Cost distribution -- The paper recommends an approach where the majority of WREGIS costs would be covered by volumetric fees.  Do you agree with this or believe more of the costs should be covered through fixed fee(s) of some kind? If so why, if not, why not?
  3. Placement of the volumetric fee -- For a volumetric fee, do you think it should be placed at the point of creation of the REC or at the point of retirement of some other option?  What and why? 

A critical point to remember is that the broader the participation in WREGIS the less each participant will have to pay in fees.  Since WREGIS is voluntary, except for CA/RPS compliance, how can WREGIS fees best be structured to cover WREGIS costs and encourage as much voluntary participation as possible?

 

Please feel free to call or email me if you have questions or need clarification on something in the paper.  We appreciate your participation in the WREGIS process and look forward to hearing your comments.

 

Sincerely,

 

 

Jan Hamrin

 

 

 

 

_____________________________

Jan Hamrin, Ph.D
Executive Director
Center for Resource Solutions
P.O. Box 29512
Presidio Building #97,  Arguello Blvd.
San Francisco, CA  94129
Ph:  415/561-2100
Fax: 415/561-2105
email: jhamrin@...
______________________________
Information on CRS programs is available at www.resource-solutions.org
Curious about Green-e and green power? Check out www.green-e.org



Western Renewable Energy Generation Information System (WREGIS)
http://www.westgov.org/wieb/wregis

If you wish to participate in or receive updates on the development process,
please see: http://www.westgov.org/wieb/wregis/committees.htm

If you have any questions, please contact:
Matthew Lehman at mlehman@... / 415-561-2100
Nellie Tong at ntong@... / 510-891-0446






Tue Sep 28, 2004 4:41 am

crscalendar
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Attachment
LAW 091504 EVAL SUMM 3 FINAL.doc
Type:
application/msword
Attachment
WREGIS fee proposal LO comments.DOC
Type:
application/msword
Forward
Message #114 of 121 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Dear WREGIS stakeholders, Due to the size of the attachments, the 2 sets of comments have been attached to this e-mail. Thank you for your patience. ... From:...
Matthew Lehman
crscalendar
Offline Send Email
Sep 28, 2004
4:42 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help