Dear Victor, I missed the conference call as I am in Amsterdam at the statistics conference. Can you tell me if a decision has been taken with regard to the...
Hello, Regarding your point number 3, I've added a note in Bugzilla. (http://xbrlbugs.decisionsoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240) The new XBRL working group related...
Dear all, I am glade to announce that the Banque de France has released its extension of COREP 1.2.1. for approval by the French banking profession. You can...
Thanks Jérôme and congrats to the team involved in this release. Will you also deliver some instance files for testing? Kind regards, Richard Preschel ...
Dear all, In template t-ci, "Own estimates of LGD And/Or Conversion factors (domain)" has in a few extended links the attribute usable="true". I presume that...
Dear XBRL COREP group, On "CR SA" template in Risk Weights Section there are items such as "of which: past due (a)", etc., and a note in the Excel file saying:...
... A short clarification - not a "prohibiting hypercube" as it concerns dimensions, not measures. A fix would be e.g. making separate risk weights sections...
Hi Mark, this is the same type of bug as in the t-cs or in the t-od taxonomy: The "... (Domain)" concept is part of the domain-member network but the "usable"...
... Dear Mark, It is not a bug. Here are two quotes from XBRL Dimensions (recommendation) specs: "2.5.3.3 The optional xbrldt:usable attribute [...] The...
Hello, I understand the meaning, but I think that if the value is "true", then the domain can be used as a valid reporting member, while this is not the...
... yes Mark, you're right, I read your letter in a hurry and interpreted it as if was a matter of "yes"/"no" vs "true"/"false" values being used by...
... I haven't gotten any reply from you yet, so I'll clarify it a bit more precisely. It makes perfect sense to me if the same element is linked to say,...
Dear Wojciech, In IRB Template `Unfunded Credit Protection' is a label given to two different elements: - p-cm-cr:UnfundedCreditProtection which is a...
Dear Wojciech, In IRB Template 'Unfunded Credit Protection' is a label given to two different elements: - p-cm-cr:UnfundedCreditProtection which is a...
Sorry, Mark I was last week in Philadelphia. A new version of COREP taxonomy will be released this week Víctor Morilla ________________________________ De:...
Dear Wojciech, You are right. A new hypercube has to be defined to prohibit the combinantions between the breakdown of risk weights and the whole set of SA ...
... Dear Bartosz, Thank you for your comments! It took me a while to reply. It looks like I overlooked the fact that target namespaces in imported primary...
Hello, I don't know if this is a bug in the COREP taxonomy or in the Fujitsu Taxonomy Editor, but anyway in the Preview Dimension Table window of CR SEC IRB...
Hi Kari, for the next release we decided not to correct bugs of "low" severity because they only deal with inconsistent element names and/or IDs (as for...
Dear all, Just a general question on the use of dimensions (see attachment). Best regards, Mark Creemers ... Visit our website! http://www.nbb.be "DISCLAIMER:...
Dear all, Linked to the question above, and also with regard to the expected update of COREP, the closed attribute in arcrole "notAll" is sometimes "true" and...
Hello Mark, Could you prepare the set of member combinations that you want to allow/disallow? It looks to me that if your real purpose is to "prohibit the use...
Hello Ignacio, They belong to the same extended link. One of them is "all" arcrole, the other is "notAll" arcrole. If I understand your second paragraph...
Hello Mark, You don't need to create a "notAll" hypercube. You just need to prohibit the relationship that adds the d2m1 member to the domain of members of d2....
Dear Ignacio, Thanks for your answer. One clarification: my example was maybe a little bit too restrictive. The purpose was of course that the first hypercube...
Hello Mark, ... purpose was of course that the first ... was linked to only a few primary ... the first hypercube would not ... This is interesting. You are...
Hello again, Ignacio, Just one last remark: the spec is perfectly clear about the use of the closed attribute, certainly no problem about that. I was just...
