Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
canroads · Canadian roads and highways
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Calgary Stoney Trail Update   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #25461 of 26028 |
Re: Calgary Stoney Trail Update

I took a drive on it too. Once this section from QE-2 to TCH-1 NW leg is
completed;it still will not qualify TCH-1 and QE-2 on a freeway network. There
are two lights on the entire leg. One at Centre Street and the other at Nose
Hill Drive which is across the bridge. I don't think in our remaining lifetimes
will we see interchanges at those location. It will take many years for that to
happen.






--- In canroads@yahoogroups.com, "Dan Muzika" <damu81@...> wrote:
>
>
> I took a drive on it last night and looks good. One thing that puzzles
> me is that only a flyover was constructed at Shaganappi Trail, even
> though the ultimate plan calls for a cloverstack,
> http://www.transportation.alberta.ca/Content/docType490/production/stsha\
> g-m1.pdf
> <http://www.transportation.alberta.ca/Content/docType490/production/stsh\
> ag-m1.pdf> , hence the high mast lighting at a flyover. Unlike Sarcee
> Trail NW, Shaganappi Trail is an expressway the entire length (Sarcee
> Trail downgrades to urban arterial north of Stoney Trail) and connects
> with 16 Avenue (TCH 1). There is essentially RIRO access for Shaganappi
> north of Stoney Trail, however Shaganappi terminates shortly north of
> Stoney Trail. At the very least a diamond or parclo interchange could
> have been constrcuted that can be converted to a cloverstack.
>
>
> --- In canroads@yahoogroups.com, Stephane Dumas <stephdumas@> wrote:
> >
> > that's a good news and I agree about that traffic light. Also someone
> posted videos of Stoney Trail at
> http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showpost.php?p=4352154&postcount=1346
> >
> > Stéphane Dumas
> >
>





Sun Jul 12, 2009 12:05 am

sammycaseyan...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #25461 of 26028 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Stoney Trail NW is now open to traffic between Sarcee Trail NW and Harvest Hills Blvd. North as of this afternoon. :)...
Steve Perry
srperrycgy
Offline Send Email
Jul 11, 2009
12:32 am

... Now only if they could get rid of the traffic light!...
sammycaseyandjoey
sammycaseyan...
Offline Send Email
Jul 11, 2009
3:19 am

that's a good news and I agree about that traffic light. Also someone posted videos of Stoney Trail at...
Stephane Dumas
sailordumas
Offline Send Email
Jul 11, 2009
12:39 pm

I took a drive on it last night and looks good. One thing that puzzles me is that only a flyover was constructed at Shaganappi Trail, even though the ultimate...
Dan Muzika
dmuzika
Offline Send Email
Jul 11, 2009
4:13 pm

I suspect it was perhaps due to budget constraints or they think there not enough traffic yet for a full cloverstack Another point to mention, is AB-201/Stoney...
sailordumas
Offline Send Email
Jul 11, 2009
6:31 pm

... I can understand budget constraints and traffic counts for not building the full cloverstack, but if there already is a flyover (the most expensive part of...
Dan Muzika
dmuzika
Offline Send Email
Jul 13, 2009
5:54 pm

Even with budget constraints, why would they not make it at least RIRO for the Eastbound (which they haven't done) as well as Westbound (which they have done)....
needbetterroads
Offline Send Email
Jul 13, 2009
10:12 pm

... Alberta is good at doing these sorts of things as a systematic way of leveraging change in a method of government funding, political initiatives, etc., by...
o773r
Offline Send Email
Jul 13, 2009
11:18 pm

... Although that debate has gone on, IIRC, for decades. So with the airport going, are we going to see Yellowhead completely reconstructed through there?...
captainbeowulf
Offline Send Email
Jul 14, 2009
4:54 am

... Yes... the debate has gone on probably 40 years longer than it should have... it isn't a wonder that we've taken a backseat to Calgary lately... I think...
o773r
Offline Send Email
Jul 14, 2009
5:54 am

... Hmmm. I remember voting YES in a plebiscite in the late 90's to shut it down. (Or maybe it was NO to keep it in operation) Either way, the "close it down"...
dellis76
Offline Send Email
Jul 14, 2009
6:47 am

I took a drive on it too. Once this section from QE-2 to TCH-1 NW leg is completed;it still will not qualify TCH-1 and QE-2 on a freeway network. There are two...
sammycaseyandjoey
sammycaseyan...
Offline Send Email
Jul 12, 2009
12:06 am

... Centre St is already graded for and interchange and the final design of the Nose Hill interchange is currently underway. The province has stated that these...
dellis76
Offline Send Email
Jul 12, 2009
3:10 am

Shaganappi at Stony Trail puzzles me as well. From watching the video, it appears that it isn't even RIRO on Eastbound Stony Trail, only westbound. Strange. ...
needbetterroads
Offline Send Email
Jul 13, 2009
3:09 pm

Just looking at the pictures and video shown of the new highway. Why is it that Calgary's ring road gets exit numbering while Edmonton's doesn't? Yellowhead...
o773r
Offline Send Email
Jul 14, 2009
5:56 am

... Another interesting feature of the exit numbering on Stoney Tr is... where does it originate? It increases as it heads to Deerfoot, and it's (if I remember...
dellis76
Offline Send Email
Jul 14, 2009
6:53 am

Speaking of the defunct Tsuu T'ina portion of the SW freeway, it looks like the alternatives are brewing. There are many good news articles about this for...
needbetterroads
Offline Send Email
Jul 14, 2009
8:36 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help