<<FlipBrowser Development.htm>>

Hi friends,

It is easier to read a flip-book or e-book compared to an HTML document. So
I would recommend that we publish lengthy material on the web using a
FlipBrowser. The familiar book-like interface also helps.

And there's a wealth of FlipBooks available too.

WISH YOU ALL A MERRY CHRISTMAS< HAPPY IDD & HAPPY NEW YEAR!

Regards,
Prasanna
(Ms) M.K.Prasanna
Information Officer
Motorola India Electronics Ltd.
TSR Towers, Rajbhavan Road
Hyderabad
Tel:  (040) 3308090x 3068
Email: mkprasanna@...

Hai Everyone!
Friends I need your help. I am to take a session on the career prospects of
Library and Information Science field for our employees children. Please
help me out by letting me know the various options that a Library
professional has  today in terms of opportunities in various sectors.
Awaiting your reponses in this regard.
Regards
Leena

Hi friends,

Please send me a copy of any customer satisfaction survey/ Library survey
that you conduct or know of. This will help us design our survey instrument.

Special request to Misraji of TISCO- your inputs will be valuable.

Thanks in advance,
(Ms) M.K.Prasanna
Information Officer
Motorola India Electronics Ltd.
TSR Towers, Rajbhavan Road
Hyderabad
Tel:  (040) 3308090x 3068
Email: mkprasanna@...


********************************************
  [  ]   General Business Information

  [  ]    Motorola Internal Use only

  [  ]    Motorola Confidential Proprietary

********************************************

Hello all

I just got information that USIS library has already despatched
the book to my library.

Thanks for your attempts.
NNK

Hello all

I am looking for the following book

Design of Library Automation Systems : File
   Structures, Data Structures, and Tools
   by Michael D. Cooper
   638 pages (May 1996)
   John Wiley & Sons

I have already placed an order for the item.  But it will take
at least one month to get it.  I have no money to but it via
Amazon.  By any change if any one of you have this title I would
like to get it on ILL.

Also if any of your local agent has a copy please let me know,
I can ask my vendor to contact or buy directly from the party.
I know that a copy is available in USIS library, Mumbai.  But it is
reference copy.  Will you please check near by major libraries if
possible?

Thank you
NNK

Hello  Sudhaji,

How are you ?  Here I would like to give my suggestion regarding the
suitable
Classification scheme  for your collection.  As you said you are more
comfortable
with DDC, it is better to follow  DDC  only.  DDC  was also drawn from the
UDC, ie.
we may say that advanced or modified form of  UDC  is  the DDC.  Here I
have
a copy of UDC  with me.  Since our collection is about  2000  odd  I am
giving
broad subject  nos.  which more or less equal to DDC no.  And I have some
chapters (xerox)  (for the subjects we have here)  of  DDC ,  so I am
classifying
in DDC only.  My personal suggestion for you  is that,  please take up as a
project
to reclassify  your total collection ( not  by  overnight )  step-by-step
afterwards
you will feel really comfortable later.  But  the reclassification should
be as a
final one.  Here in our organisation,  before I join here people had done
classification
of subject  as they like.  But after I joint I told our  Boss that I want
to do in DDC,
and it is the final one  and no one should change that.  So they agreed and
I reclassified
whole lot  (though it took more time)  and now what ever book comes to the
library,
I am classifying them into DDC.

This is my suggestion only,  it upto you to decide and do as per your
convenience. O.K.

Yours

Khadar.

Hi  everyone!

I have been reading all the correspondences regularly, but I did'nt participate because I felt that I had nothing to contribute. But on this isue I have somthing to say. In the library that I work in my ex-boss had reclassified the whole collection from UDC to some modified version based on his own ideas. Frankly I do'nt understand UDC much and am more comfortable with DDC. Under the circumstances now the collection is under some subject headings with no links between them e.g. Pollution Control and no subject as Environment and also two different categories under the same subject as text and proceedings. I cannot and donot want to reclassify the whole thing and nor can I add too many subjects as it would entail a lot of data entry work (we have over 6000 books).

Any ideas/suggestions?

Regards,
Sudha

----------
From:   corporatelibrns@egroups.com[SMTP:corporatelibrns@egroups.com]
Sent:   Tuesday, December 12, 2000 1:56 PM
To:     corporatelibrns@egroups.com
Subject:        [corporatelibrns] Depth Classification?

Hi NNK,

I beg to differ from Khadar.

Since the library is a growing organism, we have to look ahead to it
growing. Nowadays, books mean technical reports, vertical file
material...etc. which, before you realise grows by leaps & bounds. To
improve precision of searching, classification is still the best tool.
Unless you have a customised/ specialist subject-headings list/ thesaurus,
like in the field of Nuclear Science.

Classification upto 3 digits is inadequate by any standards. Only for a
collection of say, less than 5000 of varied subjects will broad
classification be OK. I have seen libraries which had 45 to 50 books of each
class no. And then its like searching for a needle in a haystack. Very soon,
reclassification will become inevitable. The only alternative then is to add
additional digits on a couple of places on the book, the catalogue and so
on...sometimes one forgets to add in one place and its a mess.

The rule of thumb is- there should not be more than 5-7 books with the same
Class No.

Classification is imperfect but automation has not reduced its prime value.
The prime reason for classification is shelf arrangement & location/
identification of a book. So depth classification is preferable. That has
not been affected by computerization.

For a special library, which has a number of books on one subject, UDC is
recommended. UDC can also be used for assigning subject headings. For VSSC,
or an Engineering or IT Library UDC is good.

Regards,
Prasanna

> -----Original Message-----
> From: PMSRao@... [mailto:PMSRao@...]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 10:55 AM
> To: corporatelibrns@egroups.com
> Subject: [corporatelibrns] Reply to the query of NNK
> (vscc)-(corporatelibrns)
>
>
>
> Hello  everybody
>
> Hello  Mr. Narayana Kutty,
>
> How are you ?  I was on  10 days leave  and I resumed my
> duties yesterday
> onwards.
> Here I would like to give you my personal opinion and with my
> experience,  to your
> query  on the classification of a document in an automated
> env.  If your
> collection is
> not  a  large one then you need not go for depth classification.
>
> According to Ranganathan's Cannons of Classification,  one of them is
> Cannon of
> Convenience  which says that  we may classify  the titles
> with convenience
> to our
> librarians and users.  For automation purpose  DDC  is better
> one  and that
> too
> upto 3 digits.  In British Council Library they used classify like
> 3+3+3(author alphabets).
> That is for example:  Title-  Training for Development / by
> R. P. Lynton
> and  Udai Pareek.
> We may classify  as  (658.312)LYN.  By this we may
> differentiate books with
> same
> title with different authors.  For automationa also we may
> design with  10
> digit field
> for  Subject code.  The same method  I am using here  in my
> library which
> has our
> own  automated  library system.  For the example as you
> mentioned in your
> query
> ie. for the title "  Computer applications in Mathematics and
> Physics ";
> for this
> we may simply classify  (according to DDC) in  Computer Sc. 
> under  (004)
> or  (005)
> otherwise under Pure Scs. under  (500)  depending upon your
> users group.
> O.K.
>
> This is my personal  idea only.  If any one has better
> options we may share
> your
> ideas with us.  Looking forward for your reply.
>
> Yours
>
> Khadar, S. A.
> Librarian, NFCL,
> Kakinada (A.P.)
>
>
> -------------------------- eGroups Sponsor
> -------------------------~-~>
> eGroups eLerts
> It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!
> http://click.egroups.com/1/9698/0/_/_/_/976597408/
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -------_->
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> corporatelibrns-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>

-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
eGroups eLerts
It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!
http://click.egroups.com/1/9698/0/_/_/_/976610066/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
corporatelibrns-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Hi NNK,

I beg to differ from Khadar.

Since the library is a growing organism, we have to look ahead to it
growing. Nowadays, books mean technical reports, vertical file
material...etc. which, before you realise grows by leaps & bounds. To
improve precision of searching, classification is still the best tool.
Unless you have a customised/ specialist subject-headings list/ thesaurus,
like in the field of Nuclear Science.

Classification upto 3 digits is inadequate by any standards. Only for a
collection of say, less than 5000 of varied subjects will broad
classification be OK. I have seen libraries which had 45 to 50 books of each
class no. And then its like searching for a needle in a haystack. Very soon,
reclassification will become inevitable. The only alternative then is to add
additional digits on a couple of places on the book, the catalogue and so
on...sometimes one forgets to add in one place and its a mess.

The rule of thumb is- there should not be more than 5-7 books with the same
Class No.

Classification is imperfect but automation has not reduced its prime value.
The prime reason for classification is shelf arrangement & location/
identification of a book. So depth classification is preferable. That has
not been affected by computerization.

For a special library, which has a number of books on one subject, UDC is
recommended. UDC can also be used for assigning subject headings. For VSSC,
or an Engineering or IT Library UDC is good.

Regards,
Prasanna

> -----Original Message-----
> From: PMSRao@... [mailto:PMSRao@...]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 10:55 AM
> To: corporatelibrns@egroups.com
> Subject: [corporatelibrns] Reply to the query of NNK
> (vscc)-(corporatelibrns)
>
>
>
> Hello  everybody
>
> Hello  Mr. Narayana Kutty,
>
> How are you ?  I was on  10 days leave  and I resumed my
> duties yesterday
> onwards.
> Here I would like to give you my personal opinion and with my
> experience,  to your
> query  on the classification of a document in an automated
> env.  If your
> collection is
> not  a  large one then you need not go for depth classification.
>
> According to Ranganathan's Cannons of Classification,  one of them is
> Cannon of
> Convenience  which says that  we may classify  the titles
> with convenience
> to our
> librarians and users.  For automation purpose  DDC  is better
> one  and that
> too
> upto 3 digits.  In British Council Library they used classify like
> 3+3+3(author alphabets).
> That is for example:  Title-  Training for Development / by
> R. P. Lynton
> and  Udai Pareek.
> We may classify  as  (658.312)LYN.  By this we may
> differentiate books with
> same
> title with different authors.  For automationa also we may
> design with  10
> digit field
> for  Subject code.  The same method  I am using here  in my
> library which
> has our
> own  automated  library system.  For the example as you
> mentioned in your
> query
> ie. for the title "  Computer applications in Mathematics and
> Physics ";
> for this
> we may simply classify  (according to DDC) in  Computer Sc.
> under  (004)
> or  (005)
> otherwise under Pure Scs. under  (500)  depending upon your
> users group.
> O.K.
>
> This is my personal  idea only.  If any one has better
> options we may share
> your
> ideas with us.  Looking forward for your reply.
>
> Yours
>
> Khadar, S. A.
> Librarian, NFCL,
> Kakinada (A.P.)
>
>
> -------------------------- eGroups Sponsor
> -------------------------~-~>
> eGroups eLerts
> It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!
> http://click.egroups.com/1/9698/0/_/_/_/976597408/
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -------_->
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> corporatelibrns-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>

Hello Khadar,

Nice to hear from you.  I agree with our suggestion regarding
simple classification in the automated environment as we can
alway retrieve a document with many other combinations.  Let's wait
for more comments.

Like if we go in for simple numbers
How is it going to affect the shelf arrangement when there are
more than 20,000 documents?

What will be the situation in large libraries with over one lakh
documents?

bye

Hello  everybody

Hello  Mr. Narayana Kutty,

How are you ?  I was on  10 days leave  and I resumed my duties yesterday
onwards.
Here I would like to give you my personal opinion and with my
experience,  to your
query  on the classification of a document in an automated env.  If your
collection is
not  a  large one then you need not go for depth classification.

According to Ranganathan's Cannons of Classification,  one of them is
Cannon of
Convenience  which says that  we may classify  the titles with convenience
to our
librarians and users.  For automation purpose  DDC  is better one  and that
too
upto 3 digits.  In British Council Library they used classify like
3+3+3(author alphabets).
That is for example:  Title-  Training for Development / by R. P. Lynton
and  Udai Pareek.
We may classify  as  (658.312)LYN.  By this we may differentiate books with
same
title with different authors.  For automationa also we may design with  10
digit field
for  Subject code.  The same method  I am using here  in my library which
has our
own  automated  library system.  For the example as you mentioned in your
query
ie. for the title "  Computer applications in Mathematics and Physics ";
for this
we may simply classify  (according to DDC) in  Computer Sc.  under  (004)
or  (005)
otherwise under Pure Scs. under  (500)  depending upon your users group.
O.K.

This is my personal  idea only.  If any one has better options we may share
your
ideas with us.  Looking forward for your reply.

Yours

Khadar, S. A.
Librarian, NFCL,
Kakinada (A.P.)

Hello

Here is another topic on which I would like to have your suggestion

How deep should be the classification for a document in an automated
environment?

In the manual system we practice in depth classification to represent
the subject of the book as sharp as we can. e.g. 681.3:51:53 for a
book which deals with computer application in mathematics and physics.
Sometimes I have seen long numbers with a lot of connecting symbols
and difficult to accommodate on a standard book tag. Is it necessary
to continue this practice when we move towards a fully automated
system?

  Can anybody suggest some reading material on this topic?

Regards
NNK

Thank you very much Pradnya Yogesh

NNK

I have given below answers to NNK's queries.  If you have any futher queries, please do get back to me ao visit amazon.com site which is very user friendly.

You may also write to orders@...

Regards,

Pradnya Yogesh
Mahindra-British Telecom Ltd.

 
I would like to have full details on how to buy and make payment for
a book from amazon.

To start with, you may search by author, title, keywod etc.  You need to add the title in the shopping cart. If you want to select another title, again search by keyword and add in the cart.

2.  Check all the items and quantity added in the shopping cart, then click "proceed to continue."

3.  If you follow their step by stem  instructions, it is easy to order.

4.  If you choose to pay by draft, continue the process of ordering  till you get a message "thank you for ordering at amazon.com"

5.  Immediately you will get an e-mail acknowledgement giving the list of books you ordered and the amount that needs to be paid.  This mail can be used to get a draft from the bank.  The draft should be payable to Amazon.com and must be sent to :

AMAZON.COM, Attn: Billing Dept. 700 5th Avenue # 1700, Seattle, WA 98104

PH : 1-800-201-7575
International : 1-206-266-2992

If you choose the option DHL World mail, then it take more than 50 days though they say delibvery in 7 to 21 days.  It could be because of Indian Postal Service.

If you choose DHL Express + payment by card then, literally on the 4th day, you get the books but then you need to pay lot of extra money. Per book $ 5.95 and per shipment $30
 

Will it be possible to get the book and pay it
later or payment will have to be done on the spot.

I find that the
price of a book displayed by amazon is higher than the publishers. Is
this inclusive of dispatch charges.
 

 
Please help with full details from you practical experience.
I want to know the good and bad sides of procuring it from amazon.
 

But the price that we have to pay is too high

 
Regards to all
bye
NNK

-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
eLerts
It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!
http://click.egroups.com/1/9699/0/_/_/_/976167617/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
corporatelibrns-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Hello  everyone.

I would like to have full details on how to buy and make payment for
a book from amazon.  Will it be possible to get the book and pay it
later or payment will have to be done on the spot.  I find that the
price of a book displayed by amazon is higher than the publishers. Is
this inclusive of dispatch charges.

Please help with full details from you practical experience.
I want to know the good and bad sides of procuring it from amazon.

Regards to all
bye
NNK

Dear Prasanna
Thanks a lot

Hello all of u ,

I think there was a problem so my ealier mail was not recd by all of
u .. i think we need to discuss the article in detail.

Firstly what we understand from this , how can we put an Indian
perspective to it ..
scondly what does it means to us ..  ie in terms of resources or
services provided by us
how can we access them, or search for the ones which are suitable and
feasible to us ..
then how are we going to incorporate their use in our present
structure .. a detailed study need to be done on the usage of the new
resources and the resultant services or info dessimination arising
out of it ,,
Actual way to do it ..

onece this is worked out , then we can approcah the top mgmt or the
nec officials concerned .. a strategy need to be formed so that the
chances of the plan being rejected wld be to a mini , consideg the
various circumstances and situations existing in all ur work place ..

Are we going to fight the system and see to it that it comes in place
..

I wld like to have inputs on this chain of thoughts .. which i just
jotted down ...

For me -- the personal task is to make the Library visible to every
one thru out the org .. make a place for  myself as an indispensible
part of the growing org... for this we need innovation and creativity
at our each step .. how ot go about it is the billion dollar ?

any ans for that

Savita

Well if you have 45+ kilos airfreight is best.  But the flip side is that the
addressee will have to clear customs.  Alternatively, you can use Post - air
mail is reliable and goes in about 10 days  or speed post too and it is fast and
reaches in about 4 days
K Srinivasamurthy
--

On Tue, 28 Nov 2000 18:37:40
  B.P.Prakash wrote:
>Hello friends,
>If I  have  40 documents (25kg) to be sent to USA, what are the cheaper
>means /  options by air as well as surface mail we have in India.
>
>Iam sure some of you must have tried this. Pl give details
>Thanks
>Prakash
>
>


Get FREE Email/Voicemail with 15MB at Lycos Communications at
http://comm.lycos.com

Hello friends,
If I  have  40 documents (25kg) to be sent to USA, what are the cheaper
means /  options by air as well as surface mail we have in India.

Iam sure some of you must have tried this. Pl give details
Thanks
Prakash

Info. from TMTC are attached

  Regards,

  (Ms) M.K.Prasanna
Information Officer
Motorola India Electronics Ltd.
TSR Towers, Rajbhavan Road
Hyderabad
Tel:  (040) 3308090x 3068
Email: mkprasanna@...

Info. from TMTC are attached

  Regards,

  (Ms) M.K.Prasanna
Information Officer
Motorola India Electronics Ltd.
TSR Towers, Rajbhavan Road
Hyderabad
Tel:  (040) 3308090x 3068
Email: mkprasanna@...

Dear Prasanna
Thank you so much for that insightful article. Found it extremely useful.
Do keep sending in such good ones. Hope each one of us can contribute in
this manner.
Bye
Regards
Leena


> ----------
> From:  Prasannna Manazhiyil Kesavan[SMTP:mkprasanna@...]
> Reply To:  corporatelibrns@egroups.com
> Sent:  Monday, November 27, 2000 2:00 PM
> To:  corporatelibrns@egroups.com
> Subject:  [corporatelibrns] Competencies for Special Librarians - SLA
> - Special Libraries Ass ociation
>
> <<File: Competencies for Special Librarians - SLA - Special Libraries
> Association.htm>>
>  <<Competencies for Special Librarians - SLA - Special Libraries
> Association.htm>>
>
> Hi friends,
>
> Here's an SLA document on the 'Competencies for Special Librarians'. This
> should provide us some directions in which we can proceed- sort of an
> ideal
> to attain.
>
> Pl. share your views on the matter.
>
> Regards,
> Prasanna
> (Ms) M.K.Prasanna
> Information Officer
> Motorola India Electronics Ltd.
> TSR Towers, Rajbhavan Road
> Hyderabad
> Tel:  (040) 3308090x 3068
> Email: mkprasanna@...
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> corporatelibrns-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>

<<Competencies for Special Librarians - SLA - Special Libraries
Association.htm>>

Hi friends,

Here's an SLA document on the 'Competencies for Special Librarians'. This
should provide us some directions in which we can proceed- sort of an ideal
to attain.

Pl. share your views on the matter.

Regards,
Prasanna
(Ms) M.K.Prasanna
Information Officer
Motorola India Electronics Ltd.
TSR Towers, Rajbhavan Road
Hyderabad
Tel:  (040) 3308090x 3068
Email: mkprasanna@...

Hi,

I am attaching a proposal I prepared for my library. We have an in-house
package which more or less takes care of circulation. So that part is not
emphasised. Context would be different for other libraries but this could
help. I guess others can add to it.


Aside to all- Pl. share your proposals too, so it can save the others time
in making proposal.

Rgds,
Prasanna

> -----Original Message-----
> From: NK Narat [mailto:library@...]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 9:18 AM
> To: corporatelibrns@egroups.com
> Subject: [corporatelibrns] From NNK
>
>
> Hello All
>
> Hope all of you received the mail from TMTC.  I had a look at the list
> of participants.  As per my request some of you have mentioned about
> the library automation package(LAP).  It seems most of the libraries
> are using in-house packages.  If any one of you feel that a better
> package is required, have you ever thought of the features you are
> looking for in it?  I am trying to collect the features for an LAP
> from the point of view of librarians.  We working on a design for an
> LAP for our library.  If I get some useful suggestions it will be a
> great help towards a better future LAP.  All of you have seen or are
> using a package or other.  At times you must have longed to have
> specific feature in a package.  If anything of that sort have come to
> your mind anytime I am looking for that. Those who are willing to
> share ideas are welcome. Thanks in advance for your suggestions.
>
> NNK
>
>
> -------------------------- eGroups Sponsor
> -------------------------~-~>
> eLerts
> It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!
> http://click.egroups.com/1/9699/1/_/_/_/974864873/
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -------_->
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> corporatelibrns-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>

Hello All

Hope all of you received the mail from TMTC.  I had a look at the list
of participants.  As per my request some of you have mentioned about
the library automation package(LAP).  It seems most of the libraries
are using in-house packages.  If any one of you feel that a better
package is required, have you ever thought of the features you are
looking for in it?  I am trying to collect the features for an LAP
from the point of view of librarians.  We working on a design for an
LAP for our library.  If I get some useful suggestions it will be a
great help towards a better future LAP.  All of you have seen or are
using a package or other.  At times you must have longed to have
specific feature in a package.  If anything of that sort have come to
your mind anytime I am looking for that. Those who are willing to
share ideas are welcome. Thanks in advance for your suggestions.

NNK

> I need copy of the presentation made on the last day by all
> the groups.
> (including mine).
> Please send them in.

Pl. send me a copy too.


>
> Have anybody noted clearly the url of the web database
> creation software
> mentioned by Dr.Krishnan of NCL.  Please send me the link.

Its called Websuite Start. I have been trying to find the URL. No success so
far. If any of you find it, pl. pass it on.

Rgds,
Prasanna

Hai Prasanna

Hai everyone!!

A big thanks to Prasanna for the egroup..
This is Narayanan kutty from Trivandrum.  Hope all of you are fine.
I need copy of the presentation made on the last day by all the groups.
(including mine).
Please send them in.

Have anybody noted clearly the url of the web database creation software
mentioned by Dr.Krishnan of NCL.  Please send me the link.

Thanks prasanna for making me also a part of the corporate link

bye
NNK

ela vunnaru??

keep on forgetting to mail u since from the day one i returned back to
office, the work is too hectic..

more later

Aru
----- Original Message -----
From: <PMSRao@...>
To: <corporatelibrns@egroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 10:58 AM
Subject: [corporatelibrns] Thanks


> Hello  Prasannaji
>
> Thank you very much for  making me a part of  our  egroup  for corporate
> librarians.
>
> It is really a  very good idea  to have a  egroup  for our  corporate
> librarians.
>
> I appreciate  you for  taking up this type of  initiative.
>
> Let us make this egroup more active and useful among us  by communicating
> regularly
>
> and  sharing the information.
>
> Thanking you once again.
>
> With best wishes,
>
> Here  it's
>
> Khadar.
>
> Postal address :    S. A. Khadar
>                Asst.  Officer (Library)
>                Nagarjuna Fertilizers & Chemicals Limited
>                Nagarjuna Road
>                KAKINADA - 533 003.
>
> e-mail  address     :    PMSRao@...
>         (Please write in Subject as " Message to Mr. Khadar ")
> Fax       :    (0884) 362084
> Telephone :    (0884) 360234    (Office- direct)
>                (0884) 360390    (Office- board)
>                (0884) 347500    (Residence)
> ( Office working hours are from  8 AM  to  4.30 PM  and
> all  2nd  &  4th  Saturdays  and  all  Sundays are holidays )
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> corporatelibrns-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
>

Hi prasanna,

I can now immediately share my work related problems with you all to find the
solution !  Good!

Pradnya

corporatelibrns Moderator wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I've added you to my corporatelibrns group at eGroups, a free,
> easy-to-use email group service. As a member of this group, you
> may send messages to the entire group using just one email address:
> corporatelibrns@egroups.com. eGroups also makes it easy to
> store photos and files, coordinate events, and more.
>
> Here's a description of the group:
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Most of us corporate Library & Information Professionals are single-person
libraries. This is a forum to discuss our agonies, achievements, problems,
creative solutions, tools and technologies, issues and literature with fellow
professionals. Notifications about events and resources are also welcome.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Here's my introductory message for you:
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Hi friends,
>
> Welcome to corporatelibrns. Please write a few lines in reply.
>
> Regards,
> Prasanna
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> TO START SENDING messages to members of this group, simply send email
> to corporatelibrns@egroups.com
>
> If you do not wish to belong to the corporatelibrns group, you
> can unsubscribe by replying to this message, or by sending an email to
> corporatelibrns-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
> Regards,
>
> Moderator, corporatelibrns
>
> SPECIAL NOTE FROM eGroups:  Because eGroups values your privacy,
> it is a violation of our service rules for moderators to add subscribers
> to a group against their wishes. If you feel this has happened, please
> notify us at egroups-abuse@...
>
> P.S.  If you would like to learn more about the corporatelibrns group,
> please visit http://www.egroups.com/group/corporatelibrns and
> enter the following sign-in information:
>
>         Email address: yogeshpr@...
>         Password: nbkamwfu
>
> This password has been randomly generated for you. Once you have signed
> in, you should change your password by visiting
> http://www.egroups.com/myprofile
>
>

hi!
good to know that the group has been created. will keep in touch

regards,
sudha

Hello  Prasannaji

Thank you very much for  making me a part of  our  egroup  for corporate
librarians.

It is really a  very good idea  to have a  egroup  for our  corporate
librarians.

I appreciate  you for  taking up this type of  initiative.

Let us make this egroup more active and useful among us  by communicating
regularly

and  sharing the information.

Thanking you once again.

With best wishes,

Here  it's

Khadar.

Postal address :    S. A. Khadar
                Asst.  Officer (Library)
                Nagarjuna Fertilizers & Chemicals Limited
                Nagarjuna Road
                KAKINADA - 533 003.

e-mail  address     :    PMSRao@...
         (Please write in Subject as " Message to Mr. Khadar ")
Fax       :    (0884) 362084
Telephone :    (0884) 360234    (Office- direct)
                (0884) 360390    (Office- board)
                (0884) 347500    (Residence)
( Office working hours are from  8 AM  to  4.30 PM  and
all  2nd  &  4th  Saturdays  and  all  Sundays are holidays )