Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
decentralization · Implications of the end-to-end principle
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Good news for decentralization?   Message List  
Reply Message #4013 of 7049 |
Re: [decentralization] Good news for decentralization?

I just got off the phone with Chris Payne and Hal Howard from Microsoft, and
think I can clarify.

Today's announcement is about Kerberos only. They said that at this level
their system is open, meaning that users can choose a different server from
Microsoft's to manage their identity.

Higher level issues, schema for user data, and protocols for connecting
desktop apps to clouds are not being discussed now; however they said that
they would be released with a similar philosophy.

They may have patents, and if they have them they will use them.

WSDL, UDDI and SOAP are the underpinnings of the next level(s) up.

We had a long wide-ranging discussion of what open means, and what level of
choice will be necessary for independent developers to be willing to invest
in Microsoft's new platform.

Happy to answer questions if I have the info.

Dave




Thu Sep 20, 2001 7:17 pm

dave@...
Send Email Send Email

Message #4013 of 7049 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

David Coursey [1]: "Microsoft says it wants Passport and Hailstorm, its foundation services for Web-based applications, to play well with others. So in a...
Dave Winer
dave@...
Send Email
Sep 20, 2001
1:58 pm

Questions for Dave Stutz: Dave -- Is this just a formalization of the policy you mentioned way back when, that Kerberos federations were a possibility? How...
Lucas Gonze
lucas@...
Send Email
Sep 20, 2001
4:25 pm

Here's my guess, without knowing anything. (a) Federation was always built into the system. The idea was to sell Exchange servers with federation capability....
rahul@...
Send Email
Sep 20, 2001
6:27 pm

... what book?...
Patrick Phalen
pphalen@...
Send Email
Sep 20, 2001
6:39 pm

Breaking Windows: How Bill Gates Fumbled the Future of Microsoft by David Bank Free Press; ISBN: 0743203151 I messed up his last name, its Bank, not Banks.. ...
rahul@...
Send Email
Sep 20, 2001
7:09 pm

BTW, I'm doing a conf call with Microsoft people at 11AM. If people have questions, let me know. I want to figure out what this means too. Dave ... From:...
Dave Winer
dave@...
Send Email
Sep 20, 2001
4:38 pm

In article <0b7f01c141f2$8e990a90$33a1dc40@murphy>, Dave Winer <dave@...> writes ... Has anything actually changed or is this just PR spin? They...
Julian Bond
julian_bond@...
Send Email
Sep 20, 2001
5:00 pm

I've listed my questions on Scripting News: http://scriptingnews.userland.com/backissues/2001/09/20 "My key question will be user choice and developer lock-in....
Dave Winer
dave@...
Send Email
Sep 20, 2001
5:25 pm

Previously, I've mentioned a couple solutions for decentralizing the Decentralization e-mail list (in the context of the Decentralized Decentralization...
Michael Herman (Paral...
mwherman@...
Send Email
Sep 20, 2001
5:45 pm

The Seattle Times report this morning was PRIVACY CONCERNS TRIGGER CHANGES IN MICROSOFTS PASSPORT SERVICE Microsoft is broadening its Passport...
Todd Boyle
tboyle@...
Send Email
Sep 20, 2001
6:19 pm

Don't forget to ask about people running *other* profile servers, again without Microsoft software. It's not just about the profile-based service providers,...
Brian Behlendorf
brian@...
Send Email
Sep 20, 2001
6:49 pm

I just got off the phone with Chris Payne and Hal Howard from Microsoft, and think I can clarify. Today's announcement is about Kerberos only. They said that...
Dave Winer
dave@...
Send Email
Sep 20, 2001
7:17 pm

Sorry I didn't get this until after the call. To your first question, it appears that's not a problem because they're using Kerberos, which is (they say)...
Dave Winer
dave@...
Send Email
Sep 20, 2001
7:19 pm

... What a bunch of hooey. Do *they* support Kerberos? The answer is no - they support an incompatible technology which happens to share some lineage with...
Brian Behlendorf
brian@...
Send Email
Sep 20, 2001
11:34 pm

Here's a pointer to the Kerberos FAQ for Windows 2000: http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q266/0/80.ASP The article covers interop, interop...
Michael Herman (Paral...
mwherman@...
Send Email
Sep 21, 2001
12:03 am

Re Kerberos vs MS Kerberos and implications for Maelstrom Openness. http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/21792.html "In short, it's hard to do authorization...
Julian Bond
julian_bond@...
Send Email
Sep 21, 2001
7:25 am

... This may or may not be then useful depending on how they are planning to support GSS-API Tokens (see ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc1964.txt) over http,...
rahul@...
Send Email
Sep 20, 2001
7:42 pm

... In other words, if you aren't willing to reuse code, you won't be able to support Kerb5 within the next few years, because it's not nearly as simple as...
Wesley Felter
wesley@...
Send Email
Sep 20, 2001
7:48 pm

... Wes, Could you elaborate? One would think that any API supportable over TCP could be supported over HTTP, albeit in a hackneyed way (for example, add a...
rahul@...
Send Email
Sep 20, 2001
8:45 pm

... Brian, that kind of stuff happens all the time. It's hard to keep a standard from being attacked and undermined that way. We've had to fight that in...
Dave Winer
dave@...
Send Email
Sep 20, 2001
11:45 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help