From zookog@... Sat May 02 23:21:15 2009
Return-Path: <zookog@...>
Received: (qmail 94790 invoked by uid 7800); 3 May 2009 06:21:13 -0000
X-Sender: zookog@...
X-Apparently-To: decentralization@yahoogroups.com
X-Received: (qmail 31845 invoked from network); 3 May 2009 05:10:55 -0000
X-Received: from unknown (98.137.34.46)
by m3.grp.sp2.yahoo.com with QMQP; 3 May 2009 05:10:55 -0000
X-Received: from unknown (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.25)
by mta3.grp.sp2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 May 2009 05:10:55 -0000
X-Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 3so2878299qwe.23
for <decentralization@yahoogroups.com>; Sat, 02 May 2009 22:10:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.98.81 with SMTP id p17mr7346205vcn.79.1241327444411; Sat,
02 May 2009 22:10:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <49FBAD41.402@...>
References: <gsqgkc+fmkp@eGroups.com> <49F1F002.90002@...>
<cd6401a0904241336t37670b9m8c69223b72926dc5@...>
<49F7DD04.8040100@...>
<cd6401a0904292115j7eb136d4gabfdc5c98c9ef8e8@...>
<49FBAD41.402@...>
Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 23:10:44 -0600
Message-ID: <cd6401a0905022210h297361afle4129aac43840aaa@...>
To: decentralization@yahoogroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: 74.125.92.25
X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0:0
From: "Zooko O'Whielacronx" <zookog@...>
Subject: Re: [decentralization] Laptop Versus Axe
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=396317107; y=bbKaOAoO1ikajDz603VfnEPeAX_BcSDzBPj2T7myPRor
X-Yahoo-Profile: zookog
X-eGroups-Approved-By: lucas_gonze <lucas@...> via email; 3 May 2009 06:21:13 -0000
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 8:17 PM, Lucas Gonze <lucas@...> wrote:
>
> This makes me think of a hybrid model where there's a coop of businesses
> or sophisticated friends. Maybe 5-100 companies.
Yeah! Because a company is more reliable and available and has a lot
more capital than one of your friends, but you don't want to put all
your eggs in one corporate basket.
> What's the latency like? How does it feel on an application level to
> use this instead of a typical SAN?
Greetings, people of the decentralization group! Here is the highlight of my presentation at CodeCon last weekend. CodeCon's prime directive is that every...
I pity the axe. So what's the plan for Tahoe, Zooko? Are you working on getting it bundled with unix distributions? Is your strategy to aim at low-churn ...
... So, yeah, allmydata.com stopped funding new Tahoe development a few months ago [1]. Tahoe, the Longlived Axe-tolerant File System, is now a purely...
... That's a very good question. The minimal answer is "Yes". The short answer is that you don't rely on the storage servers for confidentiality (all data is...
Zooko O'Whielacronx wrote: The two kinds ... This makes me think of a hybrid model where there's a coop of businesses or sophisticated friends. Maybe 5-100...
That's interesting. Just curious, is it easy to deploy this in a web-facing manner? For example, at Expensify we store a bunch of receipt images. We...
... Yeah! Because a company is more reliable and available and has a lot more capital than one of your friends, but you don't want to put all your eggs in one...