Pre-emptive stike on Iran.
If there is a serious pre-election terrorit attack, it will hasten a
pre-emptive attack on Iran.
Our reoprt on the forcast Oct. 30 terrorist attack
http://p082.ezboard.com/ffraudevidencelocker50744frm80.showMessage?
topicID=1.topic

Iran's developemet of a nuclear weapon is dependent on their ability
to develope kilogram-level quantities of highly enriched, bomb-grade
uranium.+ Our report:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/intelnotontv/message/402

After this point Israel and USA risk nuclear counter stikes at bases
in Israel and iraq.
It is our opinion that US gov. expects Israel to take care of this
problem based on the sale of 5000 smart bombs and "bunker buster"
bombs plus deployment of anti-missles in the region for coliation and
Israel forces,

The problem with this pre-emptive strike is USA would be viewed as
complicit. And Iran a country with a fundamentalist regime, a
government with which we have no diplomatic contact, a known sponsor
of terrorist groups like Hezbollah and supproting insurgents in Iraq
and which wants to wipe Israel off the map.

If the pre-emptive strike is late and Iran is able to make and hide
Nuclear WMD the risk of their sale to terrorist is very high almost
certian, A CLANDESTINE NUCLEAR ATTACK.+ Our report:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/intelnotontv/message/508

The pre-emptive strike would be coupled with an attempted COUP D'ETAT.

Failure to take out all of Iran's nuclear capability would result in
a nuclear stike against USA or Israel.

Wild cards: Pakistan says:
"Israel should be ready to face dire consequences if it
intends to target Iran's nuclear installations, President Pervez
Musharraf said in an interview with an Arabic language daily on
Saturday, according to a private TV channel. President Musharraf said
that Israel was "neither the policeman of the world" nor did it
have "any right to attack Iran". "Israel is committing a breach of
the world order. It should get ready to face horrendous eventualities
if it attacks Iran," he added. He went on to say that Israel's
military offensive against Iran would have negative regional and
international implications. "Iran should also give up its hardline
stance," he said."

And N. korea's reaction to an pre-emptive strike on Iran would not be
good, or predicatable.
One could not rule out a pre-emptive strike by N. Korea based on an
attack on Iran.

which brings up the possiblity of dual pre-emptive strike agains Iran
and N, Korea, which would certianly aline them with al qadia.

All of this is predicatd on the USA's ability to do home defense and
handle two fronts, in Iraq and Afghanstian and dealing with counter
strikes from N. Korea and Iran. Forseable problem is it seems our
troops are streached thin by Afghan and Iraq, and looking at a 5 year
continuious deployment in these countries, with out available troops
to rotate them out, let alone handle fronts in Iran and N. Korea.

But the alternative of N. korea and Iran having nuclear WMD just
pospones and allows the problem top grow bigger as they incresae
Nuclear weapons stock piles, and risk terroriast deployment of
A CLANDESTINE NUCLEAR ATTACK.

We see no alternative to miltary action in view of the ticking clock
and N. Korea's and Iran's dipolamatic intrangience on the Nuclear
issues.

We expect action before the end of the year.

The pre-emptive strike MUST take place before WMD are achieved or the
strike is counter productive and risks more than it achieves.

Gerald Wieczorek
Anthropologist