Further, the Bank of Japan is allowed to –
indeed must, as the banker of the gov’t – purchase newly issued
finance bills, which are simply not classified as gov’t bonds, and indeed
have a very short maturity. But they are rolled over at will.
Normally, one would expect that there are
ways in which governments can still borrow from the central bank, even if
direct bond underwriting is out. If not, then this is just another reason why
the Maastricht Treaty and introduction of the ECB has been madness. Most
importantly, the ECB can do what it wants and legally not just governments but
also parliaments have no influence whatsoever. And with the euro, governments
have even given up their right to issue currency themselves. But I suspect one
can find legal technicalities to make this still possible.
There is always the possibility of a
European government to found and own a bank, which then creates credit and lends
to the government, say at zero interest. Perhaps that’s the way to go.
From:
gang8@yahoogroups.com [mailto:gang8@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Dr. Richard Werner
Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2009 4:09
PM
To: gang8@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [gang8] Government
borrowing from central bank
It’s a technicality that central bankers like to fob off gullible
politicians with. In
From:
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 7:03
PM
To: Gang8
Subject: [gang8] Government
borrowing from central bank
090709 Gardiner re
government borrowing
Gang
See the following
http://europa.
This I have to admit was news to me. I assume that the ban on EU governments
borrowing from central banks got into EU law because it was one of the rules of
the Bundesbank. It is also a rule in
But the Bank of England now has wads of gilts as a result of 'Quantitative
Easing' and how can one see this except as government borrowing from the
central bank? No wonder Trichet is getting edgy.
Geoffrey