Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
ibmpension · IBM Pension and Retirement Issues
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Pensions Can't Win   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #67699 of 68078 |
http://www.forbes.com/2009/07/10/pension-plans-deficit-markets-bonds-retirement.\
html


Corporate Bonds
Pensions Can't Win
Peter C. Beller, 07.10.09, 11:00 AM ET

Both stock and bond markets have been rising in fits and starts since March but
corporate and public pension plans haven't seen much benefit. Indeed, the
recovery in prices for high yield debt, seen by some as an indication of an
improving economy and low future defaults, has actually hurt the pensions.

With the exception of pundits now making a fat living by predicting the doomsday
of our financial system, most people have reason to smile about the markets'
recent rally. The S&P 500, after dropping to 1997 levels this spring, gained
almost 40% by June. Not only stocks came roaring back, from April through June
corporate bonds of long duration returned about 15% as fears that credit markets
would cease to exist dissipated.

Among the biggest holders of corporate debt are company pension plans but,
perversely, what should be a windfall return for retirement plans is making a
bad situation even worse, according to pension consultant Mercer. Pensions,
unlike 401(k) plans, guarantee benefits to retired workers. Because of the way
pension plans are accounted for, the bond rally actually widened the deficit
between what companies own, and what they owe their workers. As a result, the
shortfall in the nation's corporate pensions went from 13%, or $167 billion, in
April to 18%, or $245 billion, in June, says Mercer, using the S&P 1500 index
for its calculations.

The reason for the paradox lies in the tricky accounting of company pension
plans. Plan sponsors must estimate how much money they need to invest now to
meet obligations decades away. Estimating the obligations requires its own
guesswork—how long retirees will live, how much they'll be making when they
retire -- but the tougher trick is figuring whether a plan's investments will
return enough to meet its promises.

To do that, plan sponsors use a "discount rate" to estimate returns years into
the future, explains Adrian Hartshorn, a principal at Mercer. Accounting rules
require nearly all pension plans to base their discount rate on the yield of
high quality corporate bonds. A higher rate of return means companies must
invest less today and vice versa. As bond yields go down, liabilities go up.
While the market for bonds has rallied, yields on corporate bonds have fallen
about 1%, which in turn has forced pensions to reduce their discount rate from
7.74% to 6.79%, says Hartshorn.

If pensions held only the corporate bonds they use to calculate the discount
rate, the rise in bond values in their portfolios would nearly offset those
higher liabilities. But most corporate plans choose to invest heavily in U.S.
stocks to generate higher returns and reduce the need for the parent company to
contribute earnings to the pension, says Hartshorn. (See "Indexers Love
Suffering Pensions") That creates a mismatch between their portfolios and the
way they calculate what they will owe retirees. The growing gap will show up on
companies' financial statements at the end of the year.

The bond rally predicament comes at a bad time for firms with big retirement
plans. Most corporate pensions took a beating in the stock market last year. The
average plan, which invests a majority of its assets in U.S. stocks, lost 27%
last year while liabilities rose 15%, says Robert Penter of consultant firm
Hewitt. Accounting rules once allowed companies to hold off recording those
deficits on their financial statements but recent changes forced the red ink
onto corporate balance sheets at year-end. Several large companies saw their
shareholder equity plummet or, in Boeing's case, get totally wiped out as a
result of stock markets losses. (See "Is Boeing Less Than Zero")




Fri Jul 10, 2009 3:31 pm

finitewisdom
Offline Offline

Forward
Message #67699 of 68078 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

http://www.forbes.com/2009/07/10/pension-plans-deficit-markets-bonds-retirement.html Corporate Bonds Pensions Can't Win Peter C. Beller, 07.10.09, 11:00 AM ET ...
finitewisdom
Offline
Jul 11, 2009
6:45 am

Is anyone willing to speculate on or have any information regarding a possible second attempt to convert US employees to cash balance like the UK apparently...
teamb562
Offline Send Email
Jul 13, 2009
4:43 pm

In my opinion, it would make little sense to convert everyone to a cash balance plan at this point since the pension plan has been frozen and the Pension...
madinpok
Offline
Jul 13, 2009
8:47 pm

IBM WILL convert everyone to a Cash Balance again (I predict 2012). If IBM can stall converting people to cash balance plans in 2012 instead of...
Skip B
sbogard
Offline Send Email
Jul 13, 2009
9:53 pm

It appears you all must be OUT OF IBM already and are unaware of the CURRENT PLAN; 401K PLUS PLAN only. The Other OLD PLANS were/are FROZEN as of the end of...
fstephens
Offline
Jul 14, 2009
2:55 pm

fstephens, If I understand this thread correctly, the commenters are talking about converting the US "Prior Plan" pension to a cash balance only plan. The...
cybertramp66
Offline Send Email
Jul 14, 2009
3:47 pm

... No, they cannot. Just think, though, of the rush to the door of those on the old plan if they resurrect this hosing! No need for a severance then....
ignatz713
Offline
Jul 14, 2009
8:34 pm

2012 would probably give them enough time to move investments around to be able to move them over to a cash balance plan for people still working for IBM. It...
Mike Germano
mike_germano
Offline Send Email
Jul 15, 2009
1:03 pm

Exactly ignatz713. They may very well welcome a rush to the doors for all of us hanging around waiting for a package. It just depends on how executives...
teamb562
Offline Send Email
Jul 15, 2009
1:05 pm

Not to be contrary ignatz, but when you say "no they cannot", do you mean they cannot because of current law or they cannot period? I am assuming the former is...
Kevin Wallace
nowwicked
Offline Send Email
Jul 16, 2009
4:37 am

There is a difference between freezing a plan and converting it to a cash balance plan. Even though the pension plan has been frozen, that does NOT mean it...
madinpok
Offline
Jul 15, 2009
1:04 pm

Your numbers are for current IBM employees. Are you saying that those who have retired and are collecting pensions and those who have yet to collect are...
finitewisdom
Offline
Jul 16, 2009
4:37 am

... Shouldn't one also add it those who are not yet 55 by 2012 by have over 30 years of age, since they are eligible to retire as well? IBM did a lot of hiring...
nguy4444
Offline Send Email
Jul 16, 2009
4:45 am

My estimates of those who would be safe because they are retirement eligible include the employees who would have 30 years of service by 2012, those who would...
madinpok
Offline
Jul 16, 2009
3:45 pm

Even if possible, the plan is frozen so any conversion would have to be from a dead DB plan to a dead CB plan, a rather strange conversion with the intent to...
justintm036
Offline
Jul 16, 2009
3:46 pm

... Some info you may be interested in.... Remember Richard Shea from Covington & Burling? To refresh your memory if you have forgotten, read this Ellen...
fhawontcutit
Offline
Jul 14, 2009
4:00 am

If IBM's intent was to just freeze the plan and allow people to collect their earned benefit, there would be no need for lobbying. That a former Treasury agent...
finitewisdom
Offline
Jul 14, 2009
4:56 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help