(supplimental to Vol.2, no.3)

'Mr. Vice President, tell us what you know.

Come on, Mr. Vice President, tell us what happened...

Did you ask Scooter Libby to undertake his inquiries about Ambassador
Joseph Wilson?...

Why did you independently ask the CIA for information about the
Wilsons?...

Did you know that Mrs. Wilson was a covert officer?...

Did you advise Libby to leak information about Mrs. Wilson's work in
the CIA to journalists?...

When Libby made his statements in inquiry-allegedly committing
perjury-were you aware of what he was saying?...

Was Libby fearful of disclosing something about your behavior in the
simmer of 2003?...

Nicholas Kristof of the New York Times



In a less than perfect world of a Leibnizian universe or even an
alternate and parallel one, the critical question that needs to be
ask is to what value did outing the identity of an agent have in
discrediting the findings and opinions of her husband? Or was it done
to punish him?? It would be a high-risk endeavor to take with dire
criminal consequences of which a Yale or even a Columbia law
graduate student would certainly be aware of let alone a Vice
President. The rational of the populous is that they were acting
under the premise that they wouldn't be caught... but still...

People with such power and resources would have come up with
alternate solutions that were less riskier that would have a much
better job... Or was it an attempt to undermine and stop the work
of the intelligence agent itself from discovering... the truth!

"The game's still afoot!"... (undoubtedly, the power of information
to inform would lead you to the 2 people that may have said this...
depending on what universe you're in.) It could all be very
elementary you know...

... and may all you endeavors be a prosperous one!

P. Mavin