My photo set from the meet:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/15530177@N05/sets/72157622857809510/ (i'll add the
meet and my trip to Manassas National Battlefield Park on the blog later in the
week)
--- In northeastroads@yahoogroups.com, Froggie <froggie@...> wrote:
>
> An overall decent weather day yesterday for a gathering, and plenty of
> construction going on in the area. Thus was the backdrop for the
> D.C./Woodrow Wilson Bridge meet.
>
> 14 of us gathered at a local Chili's in Huntington. The group included
> DC/Baltimore area regulars (Pete Jenoir, Brian Polidoro, Mike Kotler,
> Oscar Voss, and myself), hobbyists from further south (Scott Kozel,
> Adam Prince, Bob Malme), Brian Powell and two of his friends
> representing West Virginia, Doug Kerr and Steve Alpert came down from
> up north, and even a Michigan visitor in the name of Brian Reynolds.
>
> After lunch, we all crowded into three vehicles (in a town like D.C.,
> its best to use as few vehicles as possible for gatherings like this),
> and headed to our first stop: the Woodrow Wilson Bridge. A 2 mile
> hike from the Jones Point Park parking area out to the middle of the
> bridge (via the bike/ped path on the bridge) gave an opportunity to
> view some of the smaller details of both the bridge design, the
> inclusion of a bike/ped path on the bridge and the Washington St bridge
> deck, and a view north towards D.C. proper from the two observation
> decks along the bridge...on a normal day, both the Washington Monument
> and the Capitol building can be easily seen from the bridge.
>
> Next up was a driving tour, heading west on the Beltway towards
> Springfield, noting construction of the future HOV ramp connections at
> the Springfield Interchange (the final, "Phase 8", part of the overall
> interchange project). After some circling around Springfield proper
> (plus a short detour), we continued south and west to view construction
> of the last phase of the Fairfax County Parkway through the Engineering
> Proving Grounds at Ft. Belvoir, where grading and the bridgework at
> Rolling Rd are both well underway.
>
> Afterwards was a drive back up to the Springfield Interchange and onto
> the Beltway again, this time to see some of the construction associated
> with the Beltway HO/T lane project. This project is, in a nutshell,
> rebuilding the Beltway from south of Braddock Rd (SR 620) to roughly
> Georgetown Pike (VA 193)...both rebuilding interchanges along the
> corridor and adding 2 HO/T lanes in each direction in the median. This
> part of the tour also included a stop at the Washington & Old Dominion
> Trail to view some of the construction at the I-66/I-495 interchange
> from outside the car.
>
> Back in the car and east on I-66, a drive across the Key Bridge and
> along the Whitehurst Freeway, our next stop was Foggy Bottom, and the
> traffic circle at Virginia & New Hampshire Aves NW. This location is
> in front of the Watergate Hotel and directly on top of I-66. From
> this, we view what is likely the oldest freeway sign within the
> District, just south of the circle on WB I-66 at the exit to E Street
> and what would have been the I-695 West Loop.
>
> A short drive past some of the monuments/memorials, along the SW/SE
> Freeway, and past the Marine Barracks brought us to our final
> location...Barney Circle. This circle long represented the north end
> of what was constructed of I-295...a situation that has changed over
> the past few months with AASHTO/FHWA approval of routing changes to
> both I-295 and hidden I-695 as part of the soon-to-begin 11th Street
> Bridges project. In addition, the ramps connecting the 11th Street
> Bridge to Barney Circle were recently demolished. Another feature just
> south of the circle is another very old overhead guide sign, still
> holding an I-295 shield, for what would have been the southbound
> connection from the East Leg to the 11th Street Bridge.
>
> After Barney Circle, we all returned to the starting point to collect
> our cars and give the official farewell, though that was not it for
> everyone as several of us got together for dinner afterwards.
>
> All in all, a good meet.
>
> Froggie
>
I have never lived in New Jersey. Indeed, of the 49 states where I have
driven a car, New Jersey was 47th or 48th on the list. And it is only
in the last couple of years that I've lived close enough to visit the
state regularly – I now live less than an hour from Mahwah.
Years ago, I made some initial hypotheses about the Garden State:
1. New Jersey is extraordinarily wealthy.
2. New Jersey has the best highway system in the country.
3. New Jersey deserves the moniker "The Garden State."
4. New Jersey embodies the American Dream.
An overall decent weather day yesterday for a gathering, and plenty of
construction going on in the area. Thus was the backdrop for the
D.C./Woodrow Wilson Bridge meet.
14 of us gathered at a local Chili's in Huntington. The group included
DC/Baltimore area regulars (Pete Jenoir, Brian Polidoro, Mike Kotler,
Oscar Voss, and myself), hobbyists from further south (Scott Kozel,
Adam Prince, Bob Malme), Brian Powell and two of his friends
representing West Virginia, Doug Kerr and Steve Alpert came down from
up north, and even a Michigan visitor in the name of Brian Reynolds.
After lunch, we all crowded into three vehicles (in a town like D.C.,
its best to use as few vehicles as possible for gatherings like this),
and headed to our first stop: the Woodrow Wilson Bridge. A 2 mile
hike from the Jones Point Park parking area out to the middle of the
bridge (via the bike/ped path on the bridge) gave an opportunity to
view some of the smaller details of both the bridge design, the
inclusion of a bike/ped path on the bridge and the Washington St bridge
deck, and a view north towards D.C. proper from the two observation
decks along the bridge...on a normal day, both the Washington Monument
and the Capitol building can be easily seen from the bridge.
Next up was a driving tour, heading west on the Beltway towards
Springfield, noting construction of the future HOV ramp connections at
the Springfield Interchange (the final, "Phase 8", part of the overall
interchange project). After some circling around Springfield proper
(plus a short detour), we continued south and west to view construction
of the last phase of the Fairfax County Parkway through the Engineering
Proving Grounds at Ft. Belvoir, where grading and the bridgework at
Rolling Rd are both well underway.
Afterwards was a drive back up to the Springfield Interchange and onto
the Beltway again, this time to see some of the construction associated
with the Beltway HO/T lane project. This project is, in a nutshell,
rebuilding the Beltway from south of Braddock Rd (SR 620) to roughly
Georgetown Pike (VA 193)...both rebuilding interchanges along the
corridor and adding 2 HO/T lanes in each direction in the median. This
part of the tour also included a stop at the Washington & Old Dominion
Trail to view some of the construction at the I-66/I-495 interchange
from outside the car.
Back in the car and east on I-66, a drive across the Key Bridge and
along the Whitehurst Freeway, our next stop was Foggy Bottom, and the
traffic circle at Virginia & New Hampshire Aves NW. This location is
in front of the Watergate Hotel and directly on top of I-66. From
this, we view what is likely the oldest freeway sign within the
District, just south of the circle on WB I-66 at the exit to E Street
and what would have been the I-695 West Loop.
A short drive past some of the monuments/memorials, along the SW/SE
Freeway, and past the Marine Barracks brought us to our final
location...Barney Circle. This circle long represented the north end
of what was constructed of I-295...a situation that has changed over
the past few months with AASHTO/FHWA approval of routing changes to
both I-295 and hidden I-695 as part of the soon-to-begin 11th Street
Bridges project. In addition, the ramps connecting the 11th Street
Bridge to Barney Circle were recently demolished. Another feature just
south of the circle is another very old overhead guide sign, still
holding an I-295 shield, for what would have been the southbound
connection from the East Leg to the 11th Street Bridge.
After Barney Circle, we all returned to the starting point to collect
our cars and give the official farewell, though that was not it for
everyone as several of us got together for dinner afterwards.
All in all, a good meet.
Froggie
It is not cool to have an image so tiny and that can't be enlarged in any way. I see he's trying to protect it so that he can sell it later. I do not respect that at all. If you are going to post an image, please post it large enough to be readable?
On Tuesday, November 17, 2009, Steve <zoningpermit@...> wrote:
> It is not cool to have an image so tiny and that can't be enlarged in any
way. I see he's trying to protect it so that he can sell it later. I do not
respect that at all. If you are going to post an image, please post it large
enough to be readable?
> Steve A.
> http://www.alpsroads.net
If you can log into Flickr, you can see the really big version. If you
can't, let me know and I will post the really big version somewhere.
-c
It is not cool to have an image so tiny and that can't be enlarged in any way. I see he's trying to protect it so that he can sell it later. I do not respect that at all. If you are going to post an image, please post it large enough to be readable?
After decades of discussion, planning and eventually construction, a 2.3-mile stretch of highway is set to open on Thursday afternoon for the Brookfield Bypass of US 7 in Connecticut.
Some cool pics of the Hoover Dam By-Pass construction.
Thank You,
Jason Ilyes
JPI
Lebanon, TN
Home of the Barrel
--- On Mon, 11/16/09, Ilyes Jason 414 <jason.ilyes@...> wrote:
From: Ilyes Jason 414 <jason.ilyes@...> Subject: FW: FW: Hoover Dam bypass...Incredible Engineering Feat To: jpi17403@... Date: Monday, November 16, 2009, 4:29 PM
From: Powers David 438 Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 1:41 PM To: Ilyes Jason 414 Subject: FW: Hoover Dam bypass...Incredible Engineering Feat
Thought you'd want to see these....
THE WIDER VIEW: Taking shape, the new bridge at the Hoover Dam
Creeping closer inch by inch, 900 feet above the mighty Colorado River , the two sides of a $160 million bridge at the Hoover Dam slowly take shape. The bridge will carry a new section of US Route 93 past the bottleneck of the old road which can be seen twisting and winding around and across the dam itself.
When complete, it will provide a new link between the states of Nevada and Arizona . In an incredible feat of engineering, the road will be supported on the two massive concrete arches which jut out of the rock face.
The arches are made up of 53 individual sections each 24 feet long which have been cast on-site and are being lifted into place using an improvised high-wire crane strung between
temporary steel pylons.
The arches will eventually measure more than 1,000 feet across. At the moment, the structure looks like a traditional suspension bridge. But once the arches are complete, the suspending cables on each side will be removed. Extra vertical columns will then be installed on the arches to carry the road. The bridge has become known as the Hoover Dam bypass, although it is officially called the Mike O'Callaghan-Pat Tillman Memorial Bridge, after a former governor of Nevada and an American Football player from Arizona who joined the US Army and was killed in Afghanistan. Work on the bridge started in 2005 and should finish next year. An estimated 17,000 cars and trucks will cross it every
day.
The dam was started in 1931 and used enough concrete to build a road from New York to San Francisco . The stretch of water it created, Lake Mead , is 110 miles long and took six years to fill. The original road was opened at the same time as the famous dam in 1936.
An extra note: The top of the white band of rock in Lake Mead is the old waterline prior to the drought and development in the Las Vegas area. It is over 100 feet above the current water level.
Delaware moving to break toll booth
bottleneck with open road tolling on I-95
Posted on Sat, 2009-11-14 15:48
* AET
* all-electronic tolling
* Delaware
* newark
* open road tolling
* ORT
* toll plaza
* upgrade
At last Delaware is moving to break the worst traffic bottleneck on the
east coast - the Newark DE toll plaza on the I-95 Turnpike. Regularly
the present Newark DE toll plaza causes ten and 20 mile backups and
delays of an hour or more, making it the worst source of congestion in
the New York-Philadelphia-Baltimore-Washington DC corridor.
Plans for improving throughput here go back to about 1990.
In the past few weeks a $50m stimulus grant from the Obama
administration has allowed the previously unfunded project to move
ahead.
Until the feds came up with money DeDOT had it vaguely scheduled for
the "out years" of their present longterm plan. Used mainly by
out-of-staters any government in Delaware responsive to its electors
always seems to have higher priorities.
But with federal money flowing freely and permitting and planning long
since done, the project is suddenly a 'go.'
Delaware DOT has begun procurement on the toll plaza rebuild with the
aim of beginning construction May 2010 and completing the project in
the summer of 2011.
Rebuilding under traffic is going to be tough, especially under the
volumes experienced here.
Darren O'Neill, Newark I-95 project manager, says the contract
guidelines will go into considerable detail on conditions for taking
lanes in order to minimize construction congestion. The rebuild of the
DE1 Dover toll plaza for open road tolling three or four years ago has
served as a trial run for DelDOT in managing the challenging I-95 toll
plaza rebuild.
The toll plaza handles an annual average 100k veh/day with peak day
flows of 140k. By our calculation the 20-lane plaza has a maximum
one-direction capacity of around 5200 vehicles an hour (400 by 13 lanes
including the use of 3 reversibles). But the highway on either side
consisting of 2x4 lane roadways sometimes feeds 8,000 veh/hour (4x2000
veh/hour) into the toll plaza.
1 week reminder for the DC/WWB meet:
Notice: D.C./Woodrow Wilson Bridge Meet Date: November 21, 2009 Time:
11:00am Location: Chili's Grill & Bar Address: 6601 Richmond
Highway, Alexandria, VA 22306 (7 stoplights south of the Beltway on US
1)
Walking tour of the WWB and parts of the I-66 and SE Freeways in D.C.,
and driving tour including Springfield Interchange, Fairfax County Pkwy
construction, and Beltway HO/T lane construction.
A reminder that this will be a very walk-intensive tour. At least 3.5
miles worth of walking.
RSVP via E-mail.
Froggie
HNTB: a clarification
Posted on Fri, 2009-11-13 11:55
* clarification
* hntb
* i-95
* Maine
We wrote a pretty savage attack on HNTB's advice to the Maine Turnpike
Authority on the rebuild of their southern toll plaza near York on
I-95, and especially HNTB's belittling of the prospects for
all-electronic tolling in a several page memo in Q&A format which
they wrote for the local council called York Selectmen. In reaction to
that editorial we've heard nothing to suggest the thrust of the
critique was wrong, although we've corrected a few details. Most of the
reaction to the piece was positive, people saying stuff like: "That was
needed."
The cost estimate for building the Intercounty Connector has held
steady over the past year, with no change to last year's estimate of
$2.566 billion.
The State Highway Administration and Maryland Transportation Authority
certified that figure last week in its annual report to the Federal
Highway Administration. The agencies told the federal government the
work on the three main contracts for the ICC -- taking it from
Interstate 370 to Interstate 95 -- are all on time or slightly ahead
of schedule.
Responses piece by piece below.
Steve A.
http://www.alpsroads.net
>
>From: C P Zilliacus <CPZ@...>
>To: northeastroads@yahoogroups.com
>Sent: Fri, November 13, 2009 11:25:27 AM
>Subject: [northeastroads] Re: TOLLROADSnews: HNTB provides Maine false &
misleading advice on all-electronic tolling (EDITORIAL)
>
> >
>>
>
>--- In northeastroads@ yahoogroups. com, Steve <zoningpermit@ ...> wrote:
>
>> The editorial itself is spreading gross misinformation.
>> It's counting HOT lanes as AET roadways, which is not
>> the definition of AET. There go the first five paragraphs
>> or so.
>
>That's a matter of interpretation. The HOT lanes that I
>have seen (along California's Route 91/Riverside Freeway
>and I-15/Escondido Freeway) are, for the purposes of toll
>collection, AET.
Understood, but AET implies the entire roadway. You can travel CA 91 and I-15
without having to pay a toll. Can you even use the HOT lanes without the
transponder? The very concept of AET is that all users, not just transponder
carriers, can use the roadway.
>
>
>> "FACT: at least half the toll facilities in the country
>> are either in course of conversion to AET, doing detailed
>> planning studies, or studying it at the staff level."
>> No. Conversion to AET? Are you out of your freakin
>> gourd? (The editorial writer, not you.) Most highways
>> are indeed looking at Open Road Tolling, but very very
>> few are looking at AET for an entire roadway. Again, most
>> of them are HOT lanes.
>
>Ever heard of Maryland's InterCounty Connector (now
>under construction) ? Or Ontario's Highway 407?
407 was one of the examples given, and not in this country. The editorial said
"at least half." ICC is not a toll facility yet, so it can't count in the total
either.
>
>> "HNTB claim: no existing cash-based agency has completed a
>> total conversion to AET and therefore there is little to
>> no available comparable information to assist other
>> agencies with forecasting the applicability of AET for
>> their own roadway.
>>
>> FACT: E470PHA CO
>> completed a total conversion from cash to AET July 4 this year
>> and CTRMA TX in December last year. Moreover there have been
>> several complete conversions to AET in Australia and other
>> countries."
>>
>> Less than a single year of data from two roadways strikes
>> me as "little to no available comparable information. "
>
>Well, Highway 407 was AET from the first day of operation, back
>in 1997. And the toll collection gantries on Highway 407 are
>little different from those on Ca. 91 and I-15.
Was 407 an existing cash-based agency? I thought it was specifically created
for the 407.
>
>> "FACT: By adopting Open Road Tolling through the middle of a
>> rebuilt York Toll Plaza the Maine Turnpike will be exposed
>> to this same challenge and risk of non-collection from
>> out-of-state drivers as AET, while also continuing to bear
>> the heavy cost of cash toll collection." Wrong. With
>> AET, every driver, even a legitimate one, has to be
>> billed. You can only charge a small surcharge because
>> the driver has done nothing wrong. With ORT, the only
>> bills are sent to scofflaws because RIGHT THERE, guess
>> what, are cash lanes. So you get a nice hefty surcharge
>> to recoup your costs.
>
>I am not going to debate the issue of AET vs. cash toll
>collection, except to say that handing cash in the volumes
>that a busy toll roads generates is expensive. You have to
>pay the toll collection staff, and even in exact change lanes,
>the machines have to be emptied on a regular basis. I have
>observed cash being picked up from a few toll plazas in
>Maryland and Virginia, and the dump truck-sized armored
>vehicles that are required, along with the armed guards,
>are not cheap.
The comparison is ORT vs. AET. He's ignoring the cash booths in that matter,
and so am I in my response.
>
>With all electronic toll collection, there's none of that.
>
>Now the readers and cameras and license plate reader
>equipment is needed, and that's not free either, but it
>seems to me that it has to be much less expensive than
>the old roll-down-the- window-and- pay method. And
>there's no stop in traffic with electronic toll collection of
>any kind.
I won't deny that AET is probably cheaper in the long run than all-cash tolling
or even ORT. I will argue that AET and ORT have the "same" risks and
challenges.
>
>> Sorry, let's not let the facts get in the way of a
>> biased editorial. I wonder if the writer is in the
>> pocket of a rival company?
>
>I know the writer of that editorial quite well - personally,
>and he carefully labels his opinions as such, but more
>importantly, he knows what he's talking about.
>
So do I. And so far, apparently I know more about it than he does. Obviously
I'm not going to engage either of you in pointless debate over this, but I will
stand for the truth and make sure my points are clear.
--- In northeastroads@yahoogroups.com, Steve <zoningpermit@...> wrote:
> The editorial itself is spreading gross misinformation. > It's counting HOT lanes as AET roadways, which is not > the definition of AET. There go the first five paragraphs > or so.
That's a matter of interpretation. The HOT lanes that I have seen (along California's Route 91/Riverside Freeway and I-15/Escondido Freeway) are, for the purposes of toll collection, AET.
> "FACT: at least half the toll facilities in the country > are either in course of conversion to AET, doing detailed > planning studies, or studying it at the staff level." > No. Conversion to AET? Are you out of your freakin > gourd? (The editorial writer, not you.) Most highways > are indeed looking at Open Road Tolling, but very very > few are looking at AET for an entire roadway. Again, most > of them are HOT lanes.
Ever heard of Maryland's InterCounty Connector (now under construction)? Or Ontario's Highway 407?
> "HNTB claim: no existing cash-based agency has completed a > total conversion to AET and therefore there is little to > no available comparable information to assist other > agencies with forecasting the applicability of AET for > their own roadway. > > FACT: E470PHA CO > completed a total conversion from cash to AET July 4 this year > and CTRMA TX in December last year. Moreover there have been > several complete conversions to AET in Australia and other > countries." > > Less than a single year of data from two roadways strikes > me as "little to no available comparable information."
Well, Highway 407 was AET from the first day of operation, back in 1997. And the toll collection gantries on Highway 407 are little different from those on Ca. 91 and I-15.
> "FACT: By adopting Open Road Tolling through the middle of a > rebuilt York Toll Plaza the Maine Turnpike will be exposed > to this same challenge and risk of non-collection from > out-of-state drivers as AET, while also continuing to bear > the heavy cost of cash toll collection." Wrong. With > AET, every driver, even a legitimate one, has to be > billed. You can only charge a small surcharge because > the driver has done nothing wrong. With ORT, the only > bills are sent to scofflaws because RIGHT THERE, guess > what, are cash lanes. So you get a nice hefty surcharge > to recoup your costs.
I am not going to debate the issue of AET vs. cash toll collection, except to say that handing cash in the volumes that a busy toll roads generates is expensive. You have to pay the toll collection staff, and even in exact change lanes, the machines have to be emptied on a regular basis. I have observed cash being picked up from a few toll plazas in Maryland and Virginia, and the dump truck-sized armored vehicles that are required, along with the armed guards, are not cheap.
With all electronic toll collection, there's none of that.
Now the readers and cameras and license plate reader equipment is needed, and that's not free either, but it seems to me that it has to be much less expensive than the old roll-down-the-window-and-pay method. And there's no stop in traffic with electronic toll collection of any kind.
> Sorry, let's not let the facts get in the way of a > biased editorial. I wonder if the writer is in the > pocket of a rival company?
I know the writer of that editorial quite well - personally, and he carefully labels his opinions as such, but more importantly, he knows what he's talking about.
The editorial itself is spreading gross misinformation. It's counting HOT lanes as AET roadways, which is not the definition of AET. There go the first five paragraphs or so.
"FACT: at least half the toll facilities in the country are either in
course of conversion to AET, doing detailed planning studies, or
studying it at the staff level." No. Conversion to AET? Are you out of your freakin gourd? (The editorial writer, not you.) Most highways are indeed looking at Open Road Tolling, but very very few are looking at AET for an entire roadway. Again, most of them are HOT lanes.
"HNTB claim: no existing cash-based agency has completed a total
conversion to AET and therefore there is little to no available
comparable information to assist other agencies with forecasting the
applicability of AET for their own roadway.
FACT: E470PHA CO
completed a total conversion from cash to AET July 4 this year and
CTRMA TX in December last year. Moreover there have been several
complete conversions to AET in Australia and other countries."
Less than a single year of data from two roadways strikes me as "little to no available comparable information."
"FACT: By adopting Open Road Tolling through the middle of a rebuilt
York Toll Plaza the Maine Turnpike will be exposed to this same
challenge and risk of non-collection from out-of-state drivers as AET,
while also continuing to bear the heavy cost of cash toll collection." Wrong. With AET, every driver, even a legitimate one, has to be billed. You can only charge a small surcharge because the driver has done nothing wrong. With ORT, the only bills are sent to scofflaws because RIGHT THERE, guess what, are cash lanes. So you get a nice hefty surcharge to recoup your costs.
Sorry, let's not let the facts get in the way of a biased editorial. I wonder if the writer is in the pocket of a rival company?
HNTB provides Maine false &
misleading advice on all-electronic tolling (EDITORIAL)
Posted on Tue, 2009-11-10 21:49
* editorial
* hntb
* Maine
* Maine Turnpike
* York Toll Plaza
Maine Turnpike should ask HNTB for their money back on consulting fees
on the York Toll Plaza replacement. HNTB as general engineering
consultants have been providing false and misleading advice to Maine on
the state of all-electronic tolling (AET). HNTB's misinformation has
embroiled the Maine Turnpike in an unnecessary conflict with
communities in south Maine over how to replace the York Toll Plaza, and
set the Turnpike on a path of wasting some tens of millions of dollars
on building a contentious white elephant.
Opinions are one thing, but facts are facts. HNTB can't get basic facts
right. We say this having reviewed a recent "Q&A" prepared by HNTB
for the York Board of Selectmen. Most of HNTB's passage on
all-electronic tolling is reproduced below with facts interposed:
HNTB provides Maine false &
misleading advice on all-electronic tolling (EDITORIAL)
Posted on Tue, 2009-11-10 21:49
* editorial
* hntb
* Maine
* Maine Turnpike
* York Toll Plaza
Maine Turnpike should ask HNTB for their money back on consulting fees
on the York Toll Plaza replacement. HNTB as general engineering
consultants have been providing false and misleading advice to Maine on
the state of all-electronic tolling (AET). HNTB's misinformation has
embroiled the Maine Turnpike in an unnecessary conflict with
communities in south Maine over how to replace the York Toll Plaza, and
set the Turnpike on a path of wasting some tens of millions of dollars
on building a contentious white elephant.
Opinions are one thing, but facts are facts. HNTB can't get basic facts
right. We say this having reviewed a recent "Q&A" prepared by HNTB
for the York Board of Selectmen. Most of HNTB's passage on
all-electronic tolling is reproduced below with facts interposed:
--- In northeastroads@yahoogroups.com, Christopher Merlo <cmerlo441@...> wrote:
> Oh, I misread the subject to mean bridges on NY 110 in Suffolk County, upon
> which I find myself a couple times a month, including last night. Still not
> good news, though. The bridges listed in the article are all Capital Region
> only; anyone know where one might find a list of all 110?
https://www.nysdot.gov/main/bridgedata
Scroll to the bottom for listings by county.
http://tinyurl.com/ycwkqz7
I've always been reasonably impressed with the New York Sate Bridge Authority:
The bridges are well-maintained, yet the tolls have stayed within the bounds of
reason.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:22 AM, Douglas Kerr <dougtone@...> wrote:
There are 110 bridges across New York state
Oh, I misread the subject to mean bridges on NY 110 in Suffolk County, upon which I find myself a couple times a month, including last night. Still not good news, though. The bridges listed in the article are all Capital Region only; anyone know where one might find a list of all 110?
-c
There are 110 bridges across New York state that were ranked by the state as less safe than the Champlain Bridge near Crown Point that engineers only recently found to be on the verge of collapse.
http://www.wcax.com/global/story.asp?s=11471267http://www.lcbclosure.org
For those unfamilliar, this is the bridge on NY 185/VT 17, near the
south end of Lake Champlain. It was closed last year after NYSDOT and
VTrans officials deemed it unsafe. Today's announcement comes on the
heels of the preliminary report from URS which basically says the
bridge's piers are too far gone for the bridge to be rehabbed.
Will be interesting to see how the bridge replacement gets
fast-tracked, since NYSDOT/VTrans were already planning a $50 million
project in 2013 that would have done major rehab or replacement of the
bridge.
Froggie
PennDOT Secretary Allen Biehler joined with local and state officials today to
announce that Interstate 376 now officially extends from Interstate 80 in Sharon
to I-76/PA Turnpike in Monroeville. Starting today, PennDOT will install or
uncover new Interstate 376 markers along the now former PA 60 corridor. PA 60
is now just signed between Robinson and the West End.
http://tinyurl.com/ylhplr4
Jeff Kitsko
Webmaster
Pennsylvania Highways: http://www.pahighways.com/
Apparently the stimulus has freed up some cash for these 4 lane routes through Maryland and West Virginia. Leaders from the Potomac Highlands are on their way to DC to make sure more funding gets allocated to these projects. Also, I am pretty sure that PA has committed to expanding US 219 south of Somerset, right?