Skip to search.

Breaking News Visit Yahoo! News for the latest.

×Close this window

real_options_discussion · Real Options

The Yahoo! Groups Product Blog

Check it out!

Group Information

  • Members: 225
  • Category: Other
  • Founded: Sep 16, 2008
  • Language: English
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Home

 

Activity within 7 days:

1 New Member - 7 New Messages

Description

  • Options have value.
  • Options expire.
  • Never commit early unless you know why.

A discussion group for discussing topics relates to Real Options. This includes, but is not limited to financial mathematics, sociology, cognitive behavior therapy, social dynamics, management, management styles, risk management, portfolio management, governance and general interest. Basically anything related to making decisions and/or commitments.

Chris Matts and Olav Maassen started working on this in 2006 and since than Real Options has gradually gained interest (pun intended). Another big promotor of Real Options is David Anderson who sees Real Options as the future of corporate governance.

New members might want to read up on the infoQ article on the connection between Agile and Real Options and Feature Injection article (available soon).

We want to maintain a very high signal to noise ratio on this list. So this means no announcements or commercial posting of any kind unless approved by the moderators. Posters of commercial content and advertising will be banned.

Most Recent Messages

  (View All)
Re: Does there need to be commitment?
I agree and, even more generally, a commitment does not have to be between two parties. An obligation is a legal, social (moral) or contractual expectation. As
Posted - Mon May 20, 2013 5:58 pm
David Peterson
dpeterson72
Send Email Send Email
Re: Does there need to be commitment?
Certainly as regards English law, an oral contract is in principle no different from a written one. And from a contractual point of view, I see no fundamental
Posted - Mon May 20, 2013 4:59 pm
Nick de Voil
nickdevoil
Send Email Send Email
Re: Does there need to be commitment?
Josephine, This is a useful distinction, i.e. the loss of “goodwill” as an asset vs. a financial liability. Also, to muddy the waters a bit, I think that
Posted - Mon May 20, 2013 4:18 pm
Lukasz Szyrmer
lszyrmer
Send Email Send Email
Re: Does there need to be commitment?
Hi David, Not exactly, because I would not say commitment implies obligation but rather it leads to obligation. Using the engagement-wedding example, 'I accept
Posted - Mon May 20, 2013 4:44 am
Josephine Gemson
josephine4685
Send Email Send Email
Posted - Sun May 19, 2013 4:52 pm
partha ray
machun010
Send Email Send Email
Add real_options_discussion to your personalized My Yahoo! page Add to My Yahoo! XML What's This?

Message History

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2013 2 44 13
2012 11 19 2 1
2011 1 13 6
2010 8 45 24 6 111 17 1 1 15 2
2009 28 41 23 14 31 116 48 14 1 1 7 2
2008 79 149 1 95

Copyright 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help