I'm curious how many of those were approved by the submitter. I don't
approve my own, but I know some people do, which (IMHO) defeats the
purpose of having a human reviewing system. That would help explain a
last-in, first-out result. I have several old suggested feeds, some
of which I've killed off while still in the approval queue because I
knew they were dead (e.g., they were mine and I knew they were
permanently gone). Feed 541948 is probably the oldest
awaiting-approval of mine that I actually "care" about, going back to
the beginning of 2008; feed 473521 goes back to mid-2006.

--
Stuart Whitmore (snakestu@...)
http://www.just-stuart.com/


On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Denny Gibson <denny@...> wrote:
> A spot check of the latest 200 approvals shows many that are about a
> month and few more than several months old. Actually, there were none
> older than June of 2008 among those I picked randomly although Mark's
> feed, which I checked intentionally, obviously was. It almost appears
> as if a last-in-first-out policy is in operation. My own feed,
> 523819, has been "Awaiting Approval" since mid-2007.
>
>  --Denny
>